May 25, 2023
Managing Intellectual Property
Getting attorney fees covered is difficult according to many US attorneys. A recent ruling from the Federal Circuit amplified this assertion when the court ruled in OneSubsea v FMC Technologies that the District Court for the Southern District of Texas didn’t abuse its discretion by denying GMC’s motion for attorney fees under Section 285 in Title 35 of the US Code.
Finnegan partner Lionel Lavenue told Managing Intellectual Property that he has sympathy for FMC because a new judge doesn’t always have the full “feel” of the case for the purpose of determining whether it’s exceptional.
“That was an interesting and novel position for FMC to take, but the ruling by the court is certainly not surprising if not even expected,” Lionel said.
Read “Counsel: Federal Circuit Right to Clarify Attorney Fee Challenge”
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.