May 25, 2023
Managing Intellectual Property
Getting attorney fees covered is difficult according to many US attorneys. A recent ruling from the Federal Circuit amplified this assertion when the court ruled in OneSubsea v FMC Technologies that the District Court for the Southern District of Texas didn’t abuse its discretion by denying GMC’s motion for attorney fees under Section 285 in Title 35 of the US Code.
Finnegan partner Lionel Lavenue told Managing Intellectual Property that he has sympathy for FMC because a new judge doesn’t always have the full “feel” of the case for the purpose of determining whether it’s exceptional.
“That was an interesting and novel position for FMC to take, but the ruling by the court is certainly not surprising if not even expected,” Lionel said.
Read “Counsel: Federal Circuit Right to Clarify Attorney Fee Challenge”
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.