August 20, 2021
Intellectual Property Magazine
A job applicant filed a $75M-plus lawsuit against fashion label Alexander Wang, alleging the company “willfully and flagrantly infringed” a series of her graphical works in a video advertisement. The suit states that the applicant submitted her portfolio as part of several job application processes, as well as for an online contest. After receiving praise for her designs from an Alexander Wang talent acquisition consultant, she did not hear back from the company and was not informed that her work would be used for any purpose other than to confidentially evaluate her qualifications for the open position. Intellectual Property Magazine interviewed Finnegan partner Margaret Esquenet for her thoughts on the case.
Margaret said:
“It’s interesting that plaintiff pleads that she submitted the materials to Alexander Wang as part of a contest entry. Many contest rules require that entrants license or assign rights in their entries to the contest sponsor. If Alexander Wang can show that the contest rules included the relevant language and that plaintiff agreed to the rules, it may have a relatively easy defense without ever being required to address the merits of the claims. If the dispute is decided on the merits, however, it is likely that Alexander Wang will argue that the plaintiff is seeking to protect a particular artistic style or concept and not a specific expression. This defense was successful for Starbucks in Hayuk v Starbucks Corp., where under arguably similar facts the court dismissed Hayuk’s complaint, holding that copying an artistic style, elements, and ideas was insufficient to sustain a copyright infringement claim where there is no persuasive evidence of substantial similarity of the actual works at issue. Plaintiff will counter, however, that Alexander Wang did not merely copy an idea, but created an unauthorized infringing derivative of the specific works she submitted for the contest/job application. If the court agrees with the plaintiff that Alexander Wang simply converted her drawings to 3D figures for its videos, the court’s analysis in Hayuk will likely not save the day for Alexander Wang.”
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Commentary
February 29, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Another Patent Victory for BMW Group in the District of Delaware
February 27, 2024
Press Release
February 13, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.