直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Domain Name Litigation and UDRPs

About

Your website name is your domain

We have built an international reputation as a leading firm in the field of domain names. We handle domain name litigation in Europe, the U.K., and United States, and have been involved in cases spanning industries such as food and beverages, hospitality, computer and electronics, and media and entertainment. Because of the pervasive nature and extent of cybersquatting and infringement activity on the Internet, we advise clients on developing domain name registration strategies to help avoid or minimize more costly enforcement work down the road. We also help clients manage and set priorities for enforcement efforts by developing specific guidelines and strategies.

Our lawyers regularly handle domain name disputes. In the past five years, they have been involved in over 100 UDRPs/domain arbitrations involving over 300 domain names, addressing in the complaints a wide variety of factual scenarios and issues. We have handled, coordinated, or assisted with litigation involving generic top-level domains and country-code top-level domains in many countries, including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Denmark, Germany, Greece, India, Israel, Mexico, the Netherlands, Portugal, Uruguay, and the United States.  

Our domain name and Internet expertise derives not only from our extensive practical experience in handling such matters, but also from writing and speaking on these topics. Finnegan attorneys author articles on trademark issues arising from the Internet, including fair use, linking, metatagging, and the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, and we also review and summarize all significant Internet-related trademark decisions from U.S. courts.

Contacts

Clare A. Cornell
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2815
Email
Naresh Kilaru
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4236
Email
Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email
Clare A. Cornell
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2815
Email
Naresh Kilaru
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4236
Email
Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email

Everyone in this practice

Experience

Juniper Networks Inc. v. Juniper Media LLC
Secured a victory for Juniper Networks in the Northern District of California against Florida-based Juniper Media in a trademark infringement and cybersquatting law suit. The parties ultimately reached a settlement pursuant to which Juniper Media agreed to change its name, abandon its trademark applications, and transfer its domain names to the client. The case was ultimately dismissed following the defendant’s completion of all phase-out activities.

3:11-cv-03906, N.D. Cal., Judges Alsup, Cousins

AMC Mortgage Corp. (AMC) v. Ameriquest Capital Corp.

By filing for a preliminary injunction, obtained a court-approved judgment requiring Ameriquest to cease all use of AMC mark.

1:06-cv-03303, D. Md., Judge Legg

Advised on and conducted enforcement action against the misuse of a major global retailer in domain names for third party websites*
Advised on and conducted enforcement action against the misuse of a major global retailer in domain names for third party websites.

Insights

Webinar

Preparing UDRP Complaints: Determining Registrant Rights, Providing Evidentiary Support of Bad Faith Registration and Use

November 25, 2024

Webinar

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Schwab v. Schwab UDRP Results in Reverse Domain Name Hijacking Decision

February 2, 2023

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

E-Cigarette Respondent’s Reverse Domain Name Hijacking Argument Goes Up in Smoke

August 5, 2021

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

20[2]1: A Spase.com UDRP Odyssey

July 20, 2021

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Court Gives “Thumbs Down” to Domain Name Proxy Service’s Motion to Dismiss Facebook’s ACPA Complaint

February 22, 2021

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

UDRP Decision Features Early Warning Re SCOTUS’s Booking.com Ruling

November 19, 2020

More

News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2026

September 18, 2025

Award/Ranking

Clients Name Finnegan a Most Feared in Litigation in BTI’s Litigation Outlook 2025

September 12, 2024

Announcement

World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners as Global Leaders

October 17, 2022

Announcement

Three Finnegan Partners Named WTR Global Leaders

September 16, 2020

Commentary

"A Victory for Any Brand Owner That Has Invested to Build a Brand”: Booking.Com and Legal Experts React to Supreme Court Decision

July 1, 2020

Commentary

Supreme Court Weighs Monopoly Fears in Booking.com Dispute

May 5, 2020

More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP