直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Laura P. Masurovsky

Mark Sommers Discusses the Southern District of New York's Decision to Grant Broad Injunctive Relief to Tory Burch and Future Implications to Fashion Counterfeiters

October 28, 2011

By Mark Sommers

The fashion industry continues to face a surge in sophisticated criminal counterfeiting operations–many are aggressive in their online efforts to market and sell luxury brand knockoffs. A recent court decision in the Southern District of New York granted broad injunctive relief to luxury brand retailer Tory Burch, who had filed suit after discovering more than 200 different websites selling counterfeit versions of its signature products. In this podcast, Finnegan partner Mark Sommers discusses the recent court decision, and the precedent it upholds in imposing measures against the next-generation methods and techniques counterfeiters are using to dodge liability.

Downloadable Files

  • Podcast: Mark Sommers Discusses the Southern District of New York's Decision to Grant Broad Injunctive Relief to Tory Burch and the Future Implications to Fashion Counterfeiters

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Counterfeiting/Gray Market Goods

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

消費品與服務

Consumer Products

Related Professionals

Mark Sommers
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4064
Email

Related Insights

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

Webinar

Implementation of Long-Arm Jurisdiction by the UPC Court and German National Courts: Strategic Considerations and Practical Implications

May 12, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patents Because Inventorship Could Not Be Corrected Without Giving All Inventors Notice and an Opportunity to Be Heard

April 22, 2026

Articles

Unpacking Dolby v. Roku: The First HEVC SEP-Based European Preliminary Injunction

April 16, 2026

Articles

The Interplay of Patent Term Extension (PTE) and Reissue: Merck v. Aurobindo and Its Implications, Part I

April 7, 2026

Articles

The Interplay of Patent Term Extension (PTE) and Reissue: Merck v. Aurobindo and Its Implications, Part II

April 7, 2026

IP Updates

EPR Academy: ALERT – USPTO Introduces New EPR Pre-order Procedure for Determination in Ex Parte Reexaminations

April 3, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP