直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Seminar

What is Still Patentable in the Life Science Industry? Understanding the New Myriad/Mayo Guidelines, and the Impact of the AIA Post-Grant Proceedings

May 8, 2014

London, United Kingdom

Following the Mayo, Prometheus, and Myriad court decisions in the U.S., the life sciences community has been watching closely to see the breadth of impact these cases have on their industry. In March, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued its long awaited Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility of Claims Reciting or Involving Laws of nature, Natural Phenomena, & Natural Products. During this seminar we will discuss how natural product and diagnostic method claims will be examined by the USPTO, as well as, practical advice on the types of claims that may be obtainable in the biotech, pharmaceutical and chemical fields.

Additionally, just 18 months after the AIA post-grant challenges went into effect, the USPTO has already received close to 1100 requests challenging the validity of issued U.S. patents. And the number of petitions continues to increase in the life sciences, medical device, and chemical areas, in what so far has been a very favorable jurisdiction for challengers. In view of this significant change in how the validity of a U.S. patent is being evaluated, we will also discuss best practice examples for successfully handling post-grant challenges.

This seminar will take place in London. Admission is free, but space is limited so please reserve a space as soon as possible. Email.

Related Practices

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Patent Term Extension (PTE) and Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC)

專利局受理之無效程序

Third-Party Observations

專利審理暨訴願委員會受理之無效程序: 多方複審及核准後複審

Patent Oppositions and Appeals

設計權利

Related Offices

London

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4173
Email
Michele C. Bosch
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4193
Email

Related Insights

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

Conference

BIA Start-up Festival

May 21, 2026

London

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP