直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Supreme Court Finally Gets Serious About Patents

March 31, 2014

Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)

“The U.S. Supreme Court grappled with the issue of software patents Monday in the keenly watched case of Alice Corp v. CLS Bank.” The question at issue concerns eligibility for software patents. As IAM reported, “In deciding the case, the court is confronted with the issue of how to chart a course between, on the one hand, the possibility of creating a patent system so strong that it puts all the power in the hands of the patent holder and, on the other, a more relaxed, less patent friendly system which could undermine the incentive to innovate. To some present in the packed courtroom this morning, the way the oral arguments went indicated that for the first time the nine justices appear to appreciate the broad impact of what is at stake when they decide patent disputes.”

“The problem is that if you tighten the Section 101 [patent eligibility] hurdle too much then some valid inventions won’t even get examined,” observed Finnegan partner Linda J. Thayer. “I think all of Alice’s patent claims will remain invalid, the question is—how do you get there?” A decision is expected in late June 2014.

Related News

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP