March 31, 2014
Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)
“The U.S. Supreme Court grappled with the issue of software patents Monday in the keenly watched case of Alice Corp v. CLS Bank.” The question at issue concerns eligibility for software patents. As IAM reported, “In deciding the case, the court is confronted with the issue of how to chart a course between, on the one hand, the possibility of creating a patent system so strong that it puts all the power in the hands of the patent holder and, on the other, a more relaxed, less patent friendly system which could undermine the incentive to innovate. To some present in the packed courtroom this morning, the way the oral arguments went indicated that for the first time the nine justices appear to appreciate the broad impact of what is at stake when they decide patent disputes.”
“The problem is that if you tighten the Section 101 [patent eligibility] hurdle too much then some valid inventions won’t even get examined,” observed Finnegan partner Linda J. Thayer. “I think all of Alice’s patent claims will remain invalid, the question is—how do you get there?” A decision is expected in late June 2014.
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.