March 31, 2014
Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)
“The U.S. Supreme Court grappled with the issue of software patents Monday in the keenly watched case of Alice Corp v. CLS Bank.” The question at issue concerns eligibility for software patents. As IAM reported, “In deciding the case, the court is confronted with the issue of how to chart a course between, on the one hand, the possibility of creating a patent system so strong that it puts all the power in the hands of the patent holder and, on the other, a more relaxed, less patent friendly system which could undermine the incentive to innovate. To some present in the packed courtroom this morning, the way the oral arguments went indicated that for the first time the nine justices appear to appreciate the broad impact of what is at stake when they decide patent disputes.”
“The problem is that if you tighten the Section 101 [patent eligibility] hurdle too much then some valid inventions won’t even get examined,” observed Finnegan partner Linda J. Thayer. “I think all of Alice’s patent claims will remain invalid, the question is—how do you get there?” A decision is expected in late June 2014.
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.