直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Once a Mystery, PTAB Remands Start to Take Shape

February 9, 2017

Law360

Since the introduction of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), a long standing question has been, "What happens when the Federal Circuit sends a case back to the board?" Despite PTAB proceedings beginning in 2012, appeals of PTAB decisions to the Federal Circuit did not begin until 2015. Law360 reached to Finnegan partner Jason E. Stach to discuss some of the trends that have emerged out of PTAB remands.

One challenge that attorneys are facing with PTAB remands is that there is no clear guidance. Stach believes that a framework of rules that address things such as a time frame for parties to request a conference call after the mandate issues from the Federal Circuit would be helpful. He said, "Something like that to give people some guidance and the board some guidance, at least to give a little bit of uniformity to the proceedings. But after that, the remands are going to potentially vary widely in what they cover. So I think at that point it’s going to be a panel-specific, case-specific decision on how the remand is going to proceed." Stach was also asked about outcomes of the cases returned to the PTAB. He said, "Just because you won at the Federal Circuit does not mean that you are necessarily going to win on remand. You still need to do your job and persuade the PTAB, they’re still going to look at it with a careful eye."

Tags

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), remand

Related Practices

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

專利局受理之無效程序

專利審理暨訴願委員會受理之無效程序: 多方複審及核准後複審

Related Professionals

Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins “Hatch-Waxman Litigation Firm of the Year – Branded” and David Weingarten Wins “Patent Strategy Attorney of the Year (South)” at the LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards

September 11, 2026

Commentary

Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge

September 11, 2026

Commentary

Bloomberg Law Q&A with Finnegan IP Lawyer Christian Hurt

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP