直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Charles T. Collins-Chase

Finnegan Prevails at ITC for Vuly Trampolines

April 7, 2015

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 7, 2015

WASHINGTON, DC—In a complete victory for Finnegan client Vuly Trampolines, the International Trade Commission issued a final determination of no violation on April 6, 2015, in the ITC investigation Certain Soft-Edged Trampolines and Components Thereof, No. 337-TA-908. Springfree Trampolines filed its complaint on Christmas Eve, 2013, alleging Vuly’s Thunder trampoline infringed its patent, just as Vuly was entering the U.S. market after a successful launch of the Thunder trampoline in Vuly’s native Australia. After a full evidentiary hearing, the administrative law judge issued an initial determination finding no violation by Vuly. The ITC reviewed the decision and confirmed no violation. Of the two claims Springfree asserted against Vuly, the ITC found one claim not infringed and the other invalid. The ITC also found that Springfree failed to establish the economic prong of domestic industry, resulting in a separate and independent basis for the finding of no violation.

This case is Soft-Edged Trampolines and Components Thereof, 337-TA-908, ITC.

Contacts
Christine E. Lehman, Partner
christine.lehman@finnegan.com


About Finnegan

Finnegan is one of the largest IP law firms in the world. From offices in Washington, DC; Atlanta; Boston; Palo Alto; Reston; London; Shanghai; Taipei; and Tokyo, the firm practices all aspects of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret law, including counseling, prosecution, licensing, and litigation. Finnegan also represents clients on IP issues related to international trade, portfolio management, the Internet, e-commerce, government contracts, antitrust, and unfair competition. For additional information on the firm, please visit www.finnegan.com. Follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.

Tags

International Trade Commission (ITC)

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

ITC Section 337 Investigations and Trials

Related Industries

Consumer Products

Related Professionals

Michael E. Kudravetz
Litigation Counsel
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1663
Email

Related News

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP