June 10, 2014
Law360
On June 10, Ferring Pharmaceuticals asked the Federal Circuit to affirm a finding of infringement against Watson Pharmaceuticals and to reverse a decision allowing Apotex to modify a product that infringed on a Ferring patent, Lysteda, a heavy menstrual bleeding medication. Both are generic pharmaceutical companies.
Watson is appealing an infringement finding, and Ferring is seeking a rejection of this appeal. Finnegan attorney Paul W. Browning, Ph.D. told the panel that evidence clearly showed that a portion of Watson's product had infringed Ferring’s patent. “The evidence was that up to 16 percent of certain batches—undisputed evidence—infringed,” he said.
Ferring is also appealing a post-trial order from the court that allowed Apotex to change the dissolution rate of its product, which helped it avoid an infringement finding. Finnegan attorney James B. Monroe argued that the district court read a Ferring patent claim too narrowly in deciding that the dissolution rate fell outside of its patent, which says the court should have followed its expert testimony that showed the altered product still fell within the range of its patent.
Press Release
August 18, 2026
Award/Ranking
Partner Jeffrey M. Jacobstein Named Finalist for New England Legal Awards
August 10, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Tier 1 Rankings from Managing IP; More than 30 Attorneys Named 2026 IP Stars
July 30, 2026
Press Release
July 24, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Shortlisted in 13 Categories at the 2026 LMG Life Sciences America Awards
July 15, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.