直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

A Closer Look at the PTAB’s New Post-Issuance Review Procedures

March/April 2016

Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)

Arguably no other recent change to the U.S. patent system has created the same level of upheaval as the new post-issuance review procedures at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The growth in filings of inter partes reviews and, to a lesser extent, covered business method reviews has transformed the dynamic of patent litigation in the United States. Filing a review has now become one of the main defensive weapons for a company facing an infringement suit from a patent owner. In this roundtable a group of U.S. patent attorneys, including Finnegan's Aaron J. Capron and Kathleen A. Daley, discuss how the new reviews are changing the U.S. patent landscape.

This article first appeared in Intellectual Asset Management issue 76, published by Globe Business Media Group - IP Division. To view the issue in full, please go to www.IAM-media.com.

Downloadable Files

  • A Closer Look at the PTABs New Post Issuance Review Procedures

Related Practices

專利局受理之無效程序

專利審理暨訴願委員會受理之無效程序: 多方複審及核准後複審

Related Professionals

Aaron J. Capron
Partner
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6680
Email
Kathleen A. Daley
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4098
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP