直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • 生命科学
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • 经验

PTAB上诉

About

专利审理与上诉委员会(PTAB)有权听取并裁断申请人对专利申请、专利再颁和复审程序中的不利判决而提出的上诉请求。上诉程序通过递交上诉通知书而启动,继而由申请人和审查员提交辩论诉状并可选择进行口头审理,而后由委员会以书面决定书结束此程序。申请人的书面和口头辩护不仅对上诉的成功至关重要,而且对于在专利申办中寻求上诉也有帮助, 并时刻警惕专利的执行问题。飞翰律师了解上诉的复杂性和其中所需采用的策略。我们的经验涵盖了上诉中的各种争论事项和多种技术领域。我们清楚一件上诉案件是可以影响到全球专利组合甚至潜在的商业影响,所以我们会汇集自己的经验帮助客户取得上诉的成功。

Everyone in this practice

经验

TBL Licensing, LLC v. Katherine K. Vidal et al.
Argued on appeal at the Fourth Circuit that a trademark application for the design of Timberland’s classic 6-inch “Icon” boot should not have been refused by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). The appeal is pending.

23-1150, 4th Cir.

Ex parte Masashi Sekizaki, Satoshi Ishikawa and Kimihiro Matsuura
Argued on behalf of Yazaki Corporation on an ex parte appeal at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), obtaining a reversal of an examiner’s rejection of all claims in patent application related to a novel voltage monitoring device for an assembled battery.

Appeal No. 2015-001270, PTAB, Judges Homere, Baer, Fenick

Examiner's rejection reversed in favor of Finnegan client BrainScope
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) reversed a rejection of all patent claims in a patent application related to important neurodiagnostic device features for concussion and other brain abnormality assessments. Finnegan argued throughout the examination that the examiner had interpreted a claim limitation too broadly, and failed to appreciate the advance that the application claimed. After oral argument, the PTAB judges agreed and reversed the examiner's rejection on all grounds.
Inter partes reexamination ruling reversed in favor of Finnegan client Asetek
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) reversed a rejection of all patent claims in an inter partes reexamination filed against an Asetek patent related to pioneering computer cooling technology. Asetek previously asserted the patent in two separate district court litigations in the Northern District of California. Finnegan handled both cases, including one that went to a jury trial decision. Throughout the reexamination, Finnegan argued that the examiner had applied the wrong standard to interpret the claims, which resulted in an overly broad construction. The PTAB judges agreed and reversed the examiner on all issues, thus preserving the patent in full force.

2015-007934, PTAB, Judges McCarthy, Martin, Jurgovan

In re Osslund
Represented a leading biotechnology company in appeal of an inter partes reexamination decision.

2013-004840, PTAB, Judges Green, Guest, Lebovitz
Reexamination Control 95/000,440, PTAB

Reissue proceedings at the USPTO leads to rejection reversal (Ex Parte Belliveau)
Finnegan represented patent applicant High End Systems Inc. in reissue proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.  Finnegan was successful in obtaining a complete reversal of the Examiner’s rejection of claims to LED technology.

专业见解

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 4 of 6: Choosing Between EPR, IPR, PGR, and Reissue

July 1, 2026

Webinar

Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement

May 18, 2026

Webinar

Conference

International Trade Commission Litigation & Enforcement

May 4-5, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

2026 PTAB Bar Association Annual Conference

March 18-20, 2026

Washington, DC

Webinar

What’s Working at the PTAB Now: Strategies for Petitioners and Patent Owners

March 4, 2026

Webinar

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 3 of 6: The EPR Appeals Process

February 19, 2026

More

近期活动

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

新闻

Commentary

Top Patent Officials to Review Sanofi's Double Patenting Win

March 5, 2026

Award/Ranking

Seven Finnegan Partners Named to IAM Strategy 300 Global Leaders 2026

November 19, 2025

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Remains a Top Tier Firm in the 2025 Managing Intellectual Property IP Stars Rankings

May 30, 2025

Announcement

Finnegan Partner Josh Goldberg Elected Vice President of the PTAB Bar Association

April 11, 2025

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Ranks at the Top of the Managing Intellectual Property IP Stars Rankings

June 28, 2024

Award/Ranking

Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted

April 7, 2024

More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP