直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • 生命科学
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • 经验

反垄断和专利权滥用

About

在美国,反垄断申诉可能导致大额损害赔偿和强制许可。专利权滥用申诉引发的众多问题堪比反垄断申诉,但是一旦申诉成功,将造成专利权无法实施,同时,用于开发和保护发明的巨大投资以及发明所带来的收益流也将面临风险。

美国飞翰律师事务所的反垄断律师在处理知识产权反垄断和滥用问题上拥有丰富经验。我们的律师及时为客户提供指导,将许可、诉讼及和解过程中的风险降至最低,并随时准备提起诉讼。

专利许可,尤其是业界领导者的专利许可,通常会牵涉潜在的专利权反垄断和滥用问题,许可方和被许可方都需要加以考虑以降低风险。此类问题出现于专利组合、个体专利和专利池的许可项目过程中。此外,还以申诉或反诉形式出现于专利诉讼中,令诉讼的风险或收益成倍增加。

飞翰律师事务所律师接手过许多专利侵权诉讼中的专利权反垄断和滥用申诉,以及独立的反垄断案件。在部分客户选择与现有反垄断问题专家合作的诉讼中,既精通专利法又精通反垄断法的飞翰律师能作为两个团队之间的关键接口,以最好的方式代表客户。

Everyone in this practice

经验

CMC Materials, LLC v. Dupont de Nemours, Inc. et al.
Represented DuPont in patent and antitrust litigation in the District of Delaware against a direct competitor relating to chemical-mechanical polishing compositions.

1:20-cv-00738, D. Del., Judge Hall

Haier America Trading, L.L.C. v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al.
Defended Philips from antitrust and contract claims relating to digital television broadcasting standards.

1:17-cv-00921, N.D.N.Y., Judges McAvoy, Peebles
18-2992, 2nd Cir.

Hartig Drug Co. Inc. v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
Represented Senju in antitrust cases brought by Hartig related to gatifloxacin, settled on confidential terms.

1:14-cv-00719, D. Del., Judges Batallion, Fallon

Apotex Inc. v. Senju Pharmaceutical
Represented Senju in antitrust cases brought by Apotex related to gatifloxacin, settled on confidential terms.

1:12-cv-00196, D. Del., Judge Robinson

LG Electronics v. Iridian Technologies
Secured favorable settlement of complex iris scanner technology litigation involving infringement, trade secret, contract, antitrust, unfair competition, and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act claims and counterclaims.

2:04-cv-00391, D.N.J., Judges Arleo, Wigenton

Strategic counseling for Applera on antitrust and misuse
Finnegan has represented many healthcare companies in transactions that included strategic counseling on antitrust and patent misuse issues. For example, Finnegan counseled Applera in its strategic settlement with Roche concerning PCR technology.

More

专业见解

Federal Circuit IP Blog

$85 million Verdict Affirmed: Federal Circuit Shuts Down Ingevity’s Challenge to Antitrust Verdict

February 27, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – December 2025

December 1, 2025

Articles

Implications of California's AB 824 Patent Settlement Regulation

May 21, 2025

Virtual Seminar

2025 ACC SFBA Life Sciences Conference

March 4-6, 2025

Virtual

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Later Induced Infringement Claims May Not Be Barred by Earlier Direct Infringement Claims

July 13, 2023

Conference

2022 FCBA Global Series Spring Session

April 26, 2022

Washington, DC

More

新闻

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s Munich Office Earns Recognition in 2026 Best Law Firms – Germany Rankings

September 25, 2025

Award/Ranking

10 Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2023 IAM Strategy 300 List

October 5, 2023

Commentary

Qualcomm’s Victory Dims Prospects of Antitrust Patent Wins

August 11, 2020

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP