直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • 生命科学
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • 经验

原研药哈奇-维克斯曼(ANDA)诉讼与审判

About

了解创新药企业业务关切、富有创造力的资深诉讼律师

自参与美国首例《简化新药申请》(ANDA)诉讼以来,飞翰律师事务所始终走在代表创新型制药企业处理ANDA案件的最前沿,在联邦地区法院及美国联邦巡回上诉法院均积累了深厚经验。

我们的诉讼与庭审成功,源自一支经验丰富、技术背景扎实的律师团队。该团队不仅深刻理解创新制药企业的长期商业规划,也精通《哈奇‑维克斯曼法案》(Hatch‑Waxman Act)框架下ANDA诉讼的法律规则,以及药品专利法中高度专业且细微的技术与法律问题。

在过去五年中,飞翰律师事务所的律师已在近 400 起 ANDA 诉讼中,代表25 家以上原研药企业,案件涉及多款具有里程碑意义的创新药物,包括 Kisqali®、Lumify®、Prolensa®、Cymbalta® 及 Abilify® 等。

飞翰被广泛认可为保护重磅药物(blockbuster products)的“首选律师事务所”,我们承办的诸多案件属于典型的“关乎企业存亡”的重大诉讼。

但我们同样深知,无论产品规模或销售额高低,每一项产品对客户而言都至关重要。因此,我们始终坚持根据具体产品与技术特点,为每一案件量身配置最合适的诉讼团队,以实现对客户产品的最大化保护。

凭借事务所的规模优势及在原研药 ANDA 诉讼领域的深厚积累,飞翰能够在兼顾成本效益的前提下,精准匹配案件所涉及的技术领域,确保诉讼策略与客户商业目标高度一致。我们与客户紧密协作,共同制定具有创造性、协同性且切实可行的诉讼方案。

深度把握底层科学,构建有说服力的法律主张

在 ANDA 诉讼中,案件的胜负往往取决于律师事务所是否能够透彻理解专利发明背后的科学原理,并将复杂技术以清晰、有力的方式呈现给法院。

飞翰拥有约 80 名持有生物学或化学相关高级学位的专业人员,在将前沿科学转化为制胜诉讼立场方面具备独特优势。实践中,约三分之一的执业律师拥有相关领域的博士学位;此外,许多律师在加入飞翰之前,曾任职于制药行业、高等院校,或在美国专利商标局(USPTO)担任审查员。

这一多元而深厚的技术背景,使我们能够与发明人及专家实现无缝沟通,精准捕捉看似细微却可能决定案件走向的关键技术细节,并据此构建简明、易懂且极具说服力的法律论证。

提前布局,是 ANDA 诉讼成功的关键

ANDA 诉讼的成功,往往始于诉讼正式启动前数月,甚至数年。

在仿制药企业提出 Paragraph IV 专利挑战之前,客户通常即委托飞翰对其相关专利组合进行系统分析,包括:

  • 评估现有专利的覆盖范围;
  • 协助优化权利要求布局;
  • 识别并提前应对潜在弱点,
    其中也包括可能在 USPTO 对质程序中遭受挑战的问题。

无论客户正处于即将收到 Paragraph IV 通知函的阶段,还是仍在临床试验后期,飞翰始终建议:越早启动准备工作,越有利于在未来诉讼中占据主动。

ANDA 庭审需要深厚的法庭经验与科学洞察力

当庭审成为 ANDA 诉讼中最佳甚至唯一的解决路径时,飞翰能够提供技术专长、庭审经验与上诉能力的最佳组合。

在过去 60 年中,飞翰成功处理了数百起涉及高度复杂、技术含量极高的药品专利案件,并在案件一审阶段即有意识地构建完整、稳固的审理记录,为后续上诉充分保留争议焦点。

在庭审前及庭审过程中,我们充分运用深厚的科学理解能力,澄清复杂技术问题、预判并反制对方论点,以确保法官能够准确、清晰地理解案件核心。由此形成的代理工作,既具备严密的学术逻辑,又在实务层面极具说服力与实效性。

在上诉中脱颖而出

飞翰律师已在美国联邦巡回上诉法院提交并代理了数百起案件的书面陈述与口头辩论,这一数量极有可能超过任何其他律师事务所。我们成功维护的创新药物包括 Abilify®、Claritin®、Crestor®、Naprelan®、Strattera® 及 Zyprexa® 等。

事务所内约有 40 名律师曾在联邦巡回上诉法院或其前身法院担任法官助理。在任职期间,他们直接参与判决意见的起草工作,深入理解法院的内部审议机制与裁判逻辑。

这一无与伦比的上诉经验与行业洞察力,使飞翰能够在 ANDA 诉讼的每一个阶段,持续、有效地保护客户的药品创新成果。

Everyone in this practice

经验

In re Lumify

Successfully represented Bausch & Lomb and Eye Therapies in a Hatch-Waxman patent infringement litigation and parallel PTAB challenges concerning an ANDA for generic versions of over-the-counter Lumify® ocular drops. The cases settled favorably for our clients. 

3:21-cv-16766, D.N.J., Judges Kirsch, Singh
IPR2022-00146, PTAB, Judges Hulse, New, Pollock
IPR2024-00467, PTAB, Judges Flax, Pollock, Yang
IPR2022-00142, PTAB, Judges Flax, Hulse, New, Pollock

Bausch Health Ireland Limited et al. v. Aurobindo Pharma Limited et al.

Represented Bausch Health et al. in Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) litigation involving Trulance® (plecanatide) tablets for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome and chronic idiopathic constipation, resulting in favorable settlement post-trial. 

2:23-cv-00170, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
1:21-cv-00611, D. Del., Judge Stark
1:22-cv-00085, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh
2:21-cv-00573, W.D. Pa., Judges Cercone, Hardy
1:22-cv-00020, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh
2:21-cv-10057, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
2:21-cv-10403, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
2:23-cv-03333, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
1:24-cv-00036, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh
2:24-cv-07182, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
2:24-cv-11179, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
1:25-cv-00003, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh
IPR2023-00016, PTAB, Judges Hardman, Hulse, Valek
IPR2022-00722, - 01102, -01103, -01104, -01105, PTAB, Judges Hardman, Hulse, Snedden, Valek

Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation v. Shanghai Auzone Biological Technology Co., Ltd et al.

Representing Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma in litigation matters related to Radicava ORS (edaravone) used to treat patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

2:25-cv-03326, D.N.J., Judge Cecchi
1:23-cv-00759, D. Del., Judges Burke, Connolly, Hall
1:24-cv-01423, D. Del., Judge Hall
1:24-cv-00549, D. Del., Judge Hall

AbbVie Inc., et al. v. Aurobindo Pharma U.S.A., Inc. et al.

Finnegan is representing AbbVie, Allergan, and Merck in ongoing ANDA litigation involving Ubrelvy®, indicated for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults.

3:24-cv-04603, D.N.J., Judges Quraishi, Day
3:24-cv-04662, D.N.J., Judges Quraishi, Day
3:24-cv-04852, D.N.J., Judges Quraishi, Day

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC v. Hetero USA Inc., Lupin Limited et al.
Representing Merck in Hatch-Waxman litigation involving the HIV drugs ISENTRESS® and ISENTRESS® HD.

2:23-cv-00094, 2:23-cv-02364, D.N.J., Judges Cecchi, Padin, Wettre

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; Bausch & Lomb Ireland Limited; Nicox, SA v. Gland Pharma Limited, et al.

Representing Bausch & Lomb in ANDA litigation involving Vyzulta® (latanoprostene bunod) eye drops for reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients suffering from glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Bausch & Lomb sought to protect the Vyzulta® franchise against challenges asserted by generic pharmaceutical manufacturers Dr. Reddy’s and Gland. 

3:22-cv-04345, D.N.J., Judges Chesler, Kirsch, Shipp
3:23-cv-03463, D.N.J., Judge Kirsch

More

专业见解

Conference

Life Sciences Patent Network North America Spring

April 29-30, 2026

Boston

Conference

22nd Annual Conference on Paragraph IV Disputes

April 21-22, 2026

New York

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – November 2025

November 4, 2025

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Denies Presumption of Obviousness in Affirming Validity of Loading Dose Regimen Patent

August 11, 2025

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – July 2025

July 7, 2025

Articles

Implications of California's AB 824 Patent Settlement Regulation

May 21, 2025

More

新闻

Commentary

Justices to Side with Generic Drugmakers in Patent Spat, Attorneys Predict

May 5, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins IP Firm of the Year at the 2026 LSPN Awards

May 1, 2026

Commentary

Supreme Court Takes Up Generic Drug Labeling Fight

April 29, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins “Intellectual Property Firm of the Year” at the 2026 Benchmark Litigation Awards

March 12, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Shortlisted for Eight LSPN Awards

March 2, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Shortlisted for Intellectual Property Firm of the Year at 2026 Benchmark Litigation Awards

January 15, 2026

More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP