消费品 是本所业务分支,下属于 消费品和服务业.
日常用品的保护
随着各公司对产品的生产、制造和品牌推广更具创新、更加快捷、更加健康、更加环保、更加时尚或更加有趣,消费品领域不断扩大和发展。全球范围内丰富的产品选择引发了货架空间、品牌知名度和消费者忠诚度的激烈竞争。保护产品潜在的知识产权和品牌价值对其长期成功至关重要。美国飞翰律师事务所在消费品方面的经验涵盖化妆品、食品与饮料、保健与美容、营养、体育器材、电子产品等。长久以来我们一直与这些多元产业合作,我们了解产品开发和改进的快速步伐、不断变化的消费者需求以及强大品牌的力量。
法律和技术洞见
我们帮助消费品行业的客户解决各种类型的知识产权问题:
丰富的经验
我们的消费品经验包括耐用品和非耐用品以及相关服务:
不同的客户群
我们同各种规模的创新客户合作,包括《财富》百强和全球1000强企业,以及广泛的消费品行业的公私机构。我们的客户包括:
Advised a consumer-focused private investment firm on healthcare regulatory aspects of its definitive agreement to acquire a majority stake in a skin barrier and skin health brand.
Advised a multinational tobacco company on the validity of patents related to next generation vaping products, and freedom to operate issues.
Obtained complete victory against Carrum on appeal of the District of Delaware’s claim construction to the Federal Circuit following Carrum’s stipulation of non-infringement under the claim construction, thereby exonerating BMW’s ACC system, first sold in 2000, against Carrum’s 2004 patents. Invalidated several asserted claims through post-grant efforts before the U.S. Patent Office, including IPRs and EPRs, and pursued claims through proceedings before the Eastern District of Virginia to vindicate BMW’s patent challenges.
1:18-cv-01645, D. Del., Judge Andrews
21-1435, 24-1480, Fed. Cir., Judges Clevenger, Cunningham, Lourie, Moore, Prost, Taranto
IPR2019-00902, -00903, -00904, -00905, -00927, 00928, PTAB, Judges Browne, Scanlon, Tornquist
90/019,010, CRU
Represented LG Electronics in Investigation concerning certain media technologies in smartphones and televisions, home theater systems, Blu-ray disc players, and tablets. Following trial, all four asserted patents were found not infringed and/or invalid.
337-TA-882, ITC, Judge Shaw
Advised a cycling-focused startup on the preparation and prosecution of a foundational patent application, which played a key role in its acquisition by a global leader in GPS-enabled technology across fitness, outdoor, marine, automotive, and aviation markets.
Resolved litigation spanning three continents faced by video game company by negotiating a global settlement.
Articles
How Low Can You Go? Courts Lower Marking Defense Burden, Raising Patent Damages Risks
June 29, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
June 26, 2026
Articles
Prosecution History Estoppel: Navigating Limits on Equivalents in Patent Litigation
March/April 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.