直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
臧 晨, Ph.D.
合伙人
More
vCard
  • 901 New York Avenue, NW
  • Washington, DC 20001-4413
+1 202 408 4000
chen.zang@finnegan.com chen.zang@finnegan.com

臧 晨, Ph.D.

合伙人

  • +1 202 408 4000 +1 202 408 4000
  • chen.zang@finnegan.com chen.zang@finnegan.com
  • 901 New York Avenue, NW
  • Washington, DC 20001-4413
  • vCard

臧晨博士拥有全面的专利业务领域与经验,为客户提供专利法各方面的咨询服务。他多次在美国联邦地区法院及美国国际贸易委员会(ITC)代表客户进行维权诉讼。此外,臧博士在美国专利商标局(USPTO)程序亦拥有丰富的经验,涵盖专利撰写、申办审查及授权后程序等。他还就广泛的知识产权事务提供战略性咨询,包括专利组合的建立与管理、尽职调查以及法律意见等工作。凭借其物理学的学术背景,臧博士精通电气与机械领域中的多种技术,并因其在专利法和专利诉讼诉讼领域的的卓越表现入选Best Lawyers 评选的2024-2026年度“Ones to Watch 最值得关注律师”榜单。

臧律师参与多起诉讼案件涉及广泛的技术领域,包括无线通信、半导体器件及制造、存储控制器、液晶显示(LCD)及发光二极管(LED)显示、数字信号处理器(DSP)、计算机电源系统、机器人技术、消费电子、光通信、计算机网络、计算机文件存储与管理、图像或视频处理、多媒体分发与流媒体系统以及移动应用等。

此外,臧律师还长期从事专利申请与咨询业务,在专利撰写与申办、专利法律意见(包括无效性分析及不侵权分析)、以及专利组合的构建与管理方面具有丰富经验。其代理及服务的技术领域包括4G/LTE及5G/NR通信、视频编码标准、电动汽车、自动驾驶车辆、无人机、定位与运动传感系统、物联网(IoT)、消费电子、智能手机与摄像设备、计算机软硬件、无线通信、半导体计量与制造、机器学习、计算机视觉、图像处理系统、光通信、光学器件、眼科镜片、商业方法、金融科技以及网约车平台等。

在攻读物理学博士期间,臧律师致力于光电器件、显示技术、激光系统及半导体器件等方向的研究。

相关信息

  • 霍华德大学法学院专利法兼职教授。

经验

In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Devices and Products Containing the Same

Achieved a comprehensive victory for respondent Innoscience, a global leader in gallium nitride (GaN) power devices, in a high-profile patent dispute before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC’s Final Determination confirms that Innoscience avoided all patent claims asserted by Infineon.

337‑TA‑1414, ITC, Judge Moore

Jumio Corporation v. FaceTec, Inc.

Representing FaceTec, Inc. in four inter partes reviews (IPRs) relating to groundbreaking 3D liveness detection technology.

IPR2025-00106, -00107, -00108, -00109, PTAB, Judges Khan, Hoang, Baer

In the Matter of Certain Power Inverters and Converters, Vehicles Containing the Same, and Components Thereof

BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (collectively, “BMW”) earned a final determination rebuffing an International Trade Commission (ITC) complaint by Arigna Technology Limited (“Arigna”) aiming to ban the importation and sale of certain of BMW’s innovative mild-hybrid, hybrid, and all-electric SUVs and other vehicles.

337-TA-1267, ITC, Judge Bhattacharyya

iRobot v. SharkNinja

Represented petitioner SharkNinja in district court litigation and related inter partes reviews related to robot vacuum cleaner technology. Successfully cancelled all claims iRobot asserted in the district court litigation at the PTAB.

1:19-cv-12125, D. Mass., Judges Burroughs, Kelley
IPR2020-00733, -00734, -00735, -00863, PTAB, Judges Grossman, McMillin, Melvin, Saindon, Wieker

NetApp, Inc./HPE et al. v. KOM Software Inc.

Represented petitioners NetApp and HPE in a series of thirteen inter partes review proceedings. Secured institution of all claims of all challenged KOM Software patents on data storage methods and continued representation on appeal.

IPR2019-00591, -00592, -00594, -00598, -00601, -00603, -00604, -00606, -00607, -00608, PTAB, Judges McGraw, Galligan, Dougal, Fishman
20-2345, -2346; 21-1181, -1075 -1005, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Chen, Taranto

专业见解

Lecture

Latest Developments in U.S. Section 337 Investigations and Response Strategies Latest Developments in U.S. Section 337 Investigations and Response Strategies

June 12, 2026

Dongguan

Seminar

High-Stakes, High-Tech IP Disputes in the United States High-Stakes, High-Tech IP Disputes in the United States

June 9, 2026

Beijing

Seminar

3rd AI, IP, & Legal Forum 3rd AI, IP, & Legal Forum

June 6, 2026

Shangai

Webinar

AI and Patents: Navigating Innovation, Eligibility, and Enforcement

AI and Patents: Navigating Innovation, Eligibility, and Enforcement AI and Patents: Navigating Innovation, Eligibility, and Enforcement

September 18, 2025

Webinar

Articles

Motivating Suppliers to Take a License by Suing Several Customers Was Not Improper and Did Not Justify Awarding Attorney Fees Motivating Suppliers to Take a License by Suing Several Customers Was Not Improper and Did Not Justify Awarding Attorney Fees

March 22, 2016

LES Insights

Articles

No Attorney Fees Awarded Despite Weak and Changing Positions and No Direct Evidence of Infringement No Attorney Fees Awarded Despite Weak and Changing Positions and No Direct Evidence of Infringement

December 8, 2015

LES Insights
More

新闻

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 28, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 24, 2026

Commentary

CBP Clears Redesigned Innoscience Chips After ITC Case CBP Clears Redesigned Innoscience Chips After ITC Case

March 12, 2026

Law360

Press Release

Finnegan Achieves Massive CBP Victory for Innoscience, Capping a Series of Decisive Wins Against EPC Finnegan Achieves Massive CBP Victory for Innoscience, Capping a Series of Decisive Wins Against EPC

February 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Major ITC Victory in Initial Determination for Innoscience Finnegan Secures Major ITC Victory in Initial Determination for Innoscience

January 29, 2026

More
Admissions and Education

律师协会

  • 美国专利商标局
  • 加利福尼亚州
  • 哥伦比亚特区
  • 美国加利福尼亚北区联邦地区法院
  • 美国联邦巡回上诉法院

教育背景

  • 德克萨斯大学法学院
    法学博士(J.D.),2014年
  • 俄亥俄州立大学
    物理学博士,2011年
  • 中国科学技术大学
    物理学学士,2003年

语言

中文、英文

Chen律师的业务领域

AI + Finnegan
AI + Patent
AI + Trade Secrets
尽职调查、许可和意见
标准必要专利 (SEP)
全球知识产权维权、诉讼与审判
美国国际贸易委员会337调查与审判
专利诉讼与审判
标准必要专利 (SEP)
商业秘密
专利局无效程序
PTAB无效程序:双方复审及授权后复审
知识产权申办及组合管理
PTAB上诉
知识产权组合管理
意见及咨询
专利撰写与申办
标准必要专利 (SEP)
商业秘密

Chen律师的行业领域

电子和信息科技
电子与计算机技术
纳米技术
机器人技术
化学、工业和材料
3D 打印和增材制造
工业制造
通信
金融服务及商业系统
消费品和服务业
消费品
运输和物流
航空、航天及无人驾驶航空系统(UAS)

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP