直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
Brandon T. Andersen
Associate
More
vCard
  • 1875 Explorer Street
  • Suite 800
  • Reston, VA 20190-6023
+1 571 203 2713
brandon.andersen@finnegan.com brandon.andersen@finnegan.com

Brandon T. Andersen

Associate

  • +1 571 203 2713 +1 571 203 2713
  • brandon.andersen@finnegan.com brandon.andersen@finnegan.com
  • 1875 Explorer Street
  • Suite 800
  • Reston, VA 20190-6023
  • vCard

Brandon Andersen主要从事化学、制药、汽车技术、清洁能源和医疗设备领域的专利申请和诉讼,包括美国专利商标局 (USPTO) 专利审判和上诉委员会 (PTAB) 的双方复审。他拥有核电厂工程师的技术经验,曾为美国海军核潜艇项目设计系统和培训操作人员。Brandon还拥有生物医学设备和燃烧工程方面的研究经验。

Brandon在向美国专利商标局申请汽车、制药和可再生能源技术领域的发明专利方面拥有丰富经验。此外,他还在制药和医疗设备领域出具过有效性和自由运作意见。

Brandon有丰富的庭审前诉讼经验,如权要分析、现有技术检索、调查取证和动议实务。他擅长提供全面的法律研究和清晰的分析。在专利复审委员会(PTAB)的双方复审程序中,Brandon曾撰写诉状,并与专家合作准备支持性声明。他还拥有为美国联邦巡回上诉法院准备上诉和法庭之友简报的经验。

获得化学工程硕士学位后,Brandon在美国海军核潜艇项目中担任了三年的核电厂工程师。他为海军军官和士兵提供课堂和实践培训,并领导一个值班小组专门负责核电厂的运行和维护。作为一名培训师,Brandon培养了向没有科学背景的人清晰传授工程原理的能力。Brandon还担任过系统设计工程师,负责设计和编写与核反应堆相连的关键安全系统的操作手册。

Brandon还从事过生物医学和燃烧工程领域的研究。在硕士论文中,他基于化学动力学、传输现象和计算流体动力学,创建了一个多处理器、三维预测计算机模型,用于预测心血管设备中的血栓和栓塞。Brandon还在燃烧实验室从事过研究、实验并建立计算模型,以提高森林火灾中火焰蔓延的可预测性。

公益工作是Brandon执业的重要组成部分,他乐于通过公益工作为退伍军人和庇护申请人提供服务。他写的答辩在移民上诉委员会(Board of Immigration Appeals)和退伍军人索赔上诉法院(Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims)都胜诉过。Brandon还代表庇护申请人在移民法庭出庭。

相关信息

  • 首都公益组织荣誉榜,2018-2019, 2023
  • 执行编辑,杨百翰大学法律评论, 2017-2018
  • 作者,“专利商标局的部落主权豁免权”《专利商标局协会期刊》,2018
  • 伍迪-迪姆审判辩护比赛优胜奖,2016

经验

In Re Certain Polycrystalline Diamond Compacts and Articles Containing Same

Secured a decisive victory for client US Synthetic Corp. (USS) at the ITC. After a full hearing, the ALJ found that respondents infringed multiple claims of USS’s patent and that the claims were valid and supported by a domestic industry, but an initial Commission ruling under § 101 temporarily prevented a finding of violation of Section 337. The Federal Circuit reversed the § 101 ruling, and on remand the ITC found a violation and issued a limited exclusion order barring infringing polycrystalline diamond products from entry into the United States, securing final relief for USS.

337-TA-1236, ITC, Judge Elliot

US Synthetic Corporation (USS) v. International Trade Commission (ITC)

Secured a significant victory for client US Synthetic Corporation (USS) with a precedential decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) overturning an unfavorable 35 U.S.C. § 101 eligibility ruling from the International Trade Commission (ITC).

23-1217, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Dyk, Stoll

Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. et al. v. Syngenta Seeds, LLC

Representing plaintiff Pioneer in a district court patent infringement litigation involving methods for producing doubled haploid maize plants.

1:22-cv-01280, D. Del.

Bayer Cropscience LP et al. v. Corteva Agriscience LLC et al.

Representing defendant Corteva in a Delaware state court action for breach of contract arising out of a patent cross-license agreement relating to Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation and transgenic seeds.

N22C-07-168, Delaware Superior Court, Complex Commercial Litigation Division

Corteva Agriscience LLC v. Monsanto Company et al.

Representing plaintiff Corteva Agriscience in a district court patent infringement litigation involving transgenic plants and plant cells that produce enzymes conferring herbicide resistance.

1:22-cv-01046, D. Del., Judge Williams

Maglula, Ltd. v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al

Represented Maglula Ltd. in a one-of-a-kind district court litigation including patent, trademark, and copyright claims over Maglula’s assertions that Amazon sold counterfeit consumer products. After the Court issued an order (i) denying Amazon’s motion for summary judgment; (ii) finding “Amazon's attempts to avoid liability … will have minimal impact before a jury”; (iii) reflecting the Court’s belief that "not [] even the most persuasive presentation of Amazon’s evidence would make one iota of difference to a jury”; and (iv) requiring the parties to engage in mediation, the parties entered into an agreement and the case was dismissed.

1:19-cv-01570, E.D. Va., Judge O'Grady

More

专业见解

Articles

When Export Controls Meet IP: Lessons from Westinghouse v. KEPCO

When Export Controls Meet IP: Lessons from Westinghouse v. KEPCO When Export Controls Meet IP: Lessons from Westinghouse v. KEPCO

January/February 2026

IP Litigator

Articles

Switching Sides: When Do Courts Disqualify Expert Witnesses?

Switching Sides: When Do Courts Disqualify Expert Witnesses? Switching Sides: When Do Courts Disqualify Expert Witnesses?

July/August 2025

IP Litigator

Webinar

What’s Next After a PTAB Discretionary Denial? Potential Challenges, Avenues to Judicial Review, and Strategic Considerations

What’s Next After a PTAB Discretionary Denial? Potential Challenges, Avenues to Judicial Review, and Strategic Considerations What’s Next After a PTAB Discretionary Denial? Potential Challenges, Avenues to Judicial Review, and Strategic Considerations

July 17, 2025

Webinar

Articles

Navigating Through the Gate: Admitting Expert Testimony in IP Litigation

Navigating Through the Gate: Admitting Expert Testimony in IP Litigation Navigating Through the Gate: Admitting Expert Testimony in IP Litigation

January/February 2025

IP Litigator

Articles

Shall We Strive for More Clarity and Remove Shall from Our Contracts?

Shall We Strive for More Clarity and Remove Shall from Our Contracts? Shall We Strive for More Clarity and Remove Shall from Our Contracts?

December 29, 2024

LES Insights

Articles

Patent Marking Requirements

Patent Marking Requirements Patent Marking Requirements

November/December 2023

IP Litigator
More

新闻

Award/Ranking

61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

May 7, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 28, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 24, 2026

Press Release

U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Limited Exclusion Order for US Synthetic in Investigation Against Foreign Diamond Makers U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Limited Exclusion Order for US Synthetic in Investigation Against Foreign Diamond Makers

December 23, 2025

Award/Ranking

56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

April 24, 2025

DC Bar

Media Mention

Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs: US Synthetic Corp. Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs: US Synthetic Corp.

February 21, 2025

The AmLaw Litigation Daily
More

会员身份

  • 美国化学工程师协会
Admissions and Education

律师协会

弗吉尼亚州律师协会

教育背景

杨百翰大学J. Reuben Clark法学院

法学博士,优等生,2018

杨百翰大学

化学工程硕士 2012

杨百翰大学

化学工程学士 2012

语言

英语, 西班牙语

 

Brandon律师的业务领域

全球知识产权维权、诉讼与审判
联邦巡回法院和最高法院上诉
专利诉讼与审判
审前策略
专利局无效程序
PTAB无效程序:双方复审及授权后复审
知识产权申办及组合管理
专利撰写与申办

Brandon律师的行业领域

化学、工业和材料
化学
能源
清洁能源与可再生能源
服务、游戏与娱乐休闲
体育、健身及户外娱乐
生命科学
医疗设备与诊断

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP