直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
Barbara C. McCurdy
Partner
More
vCard
  • 901 New York Avenue, NW
  • Washington, DC 20001-4413
+1 202 408 4047
barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com

Barbara C. McCurdy

Partner

  • +1 202 408 4047 +1 202 408 4047
  • barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com
  • 901 New York Avenue, NW
  • Washington, DC 20001-4413
  • vCard

Barbara McCurdy律师是飞翰律师事务所的管理合伙人。她在专利权申请、执行以及辩护方面拥有非常丰富的经验,尤其专注于专利诉讼、专利咨询和美国专利商标局(U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO)的争议性专利程序领域。她曾在众多案件中担任首席律师,其中包括地区法院的审判案件、美国联邦巡回上诉法院的上诉案件、美国国际贸易委员会(ITC)的337条款调查案和美国专利商标局及法院中的专利干预案件。她受理的案件涉及各类技术,包括计算机、软件、半导体、医疗设备、化学品以及医药制品。

作为本所专利干预事务组组长,McCurdy律师的经验还涉及美国专利商标局专利上诉与干预委员会的干预程序、根据《美国专利法》第146条地区法院重审委员会的专利干预决定、以及根据《美国专利法》第291条地区法院参与干预专利。她曾受理超过25起专利抵触案件,并在大部分案件中担任首席律师。

McCurdy律师提供各类专利咨询服务,包括战略性专利申办、有效性及侵权的法律意见书、专利组合管理以及诉讼策略。她制定策略以实现委托人的商业目标,包括就如何建立重要新型技术领域的专利组合为他们提供咨询意见、在考虑到知识产权形势的前提下确定知识产权定位、就技术收购或者许可提供咨询意见以及制定进攻性和防御性的诉讼策略。

McCurdy律师还为众多的法学院学生教授专利法,为大量专利律师讲授专利抵触。她针对《美国发明法》对美国专利商标局和各法院专利事务及案件的影响,做过大量演讲。

Barbara's experience before the USPTO includes leading more than 20 contested proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). In addition to inter partes proceedings before the USPTO involving challenges to patentability and priority of invention, she also has been lead counsel in district court actions under 35 U.S.C. § 146 reviewing USPTO Board decisions and district court actions under 35 U.S.C. § 291 involving interfering patents. She has lectured extensively around the world on the strategic interplay between USPTO post-grant proceedings and litigation in district courts and the ITC.

Barbara has been recognized by Intellectual Asset Management as a leading patent litigator in the D.C. area, and nationally for post-grant procedures. Her cases have involved a wide range of technologies, including computers, software, semiconductors, medical devices, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals.

Barbara provides a range of patent counseling, including strategic patent prosecution, validity and infringement opinions, patent portfolio management, and litigation strategy. She develops strategies that meet the business goals of clients, including advising them on building patent portfolios in significant new technology areas, developing IP positions that take into account the IP landscape, advising on acquisitions or licensing of technology, and developing offensive and defensive litigation strategies. She has taught patent law to hundreds of law school students and USPTO contested proceedings practice to hundreds of patent attorneys.

Barbara served as chairman of Finnegan, following a three-year term as the firm's managing partner.

相关信息

  • Roche Diagnostics诉Home Diagnostics案(印第安纳州南区法院)。代理Home Diagnostics,一家血液检测仪器生产商,为其竞争对手提起的侵权诉讼辩护。获得一项专利的非侵权简易判决并在一次法官审理后为另一项专利赢得非强制执行的判决。
  • LifeScan诉Home Diagnostics案(德拉维尔州地区法院、加利福尼亚州北区法院和联邦巡回上诉法院)。在一项专利侵权诉讼中,代理Home Diagnostics在两个地区法院中确保了非侵权判决,并在上诉中维持了此判决。
  • 某种杀虫剂和含有噻虫胺的商品案,337-TA-635(国际贸易委员会)。在一项由Sumitomo提出的意在将Syngenta的农产品排挤出美国的337调查案中,代理答辩方Syngenta,并为行政法官和全体委员会做出的该程序最终判决进行成功辩护。
  • Vas-Cath诉密苏里州大学案(美国专利商标局、华盛顿特区法院、密苏里州西区法院、联邦巡回上诉法院)。在有关血液透析管专利的一项美国专利商标局的抵触程序、两起地区法院案件和一起联邦巡回法院案件中,代理密苏里州大学。优先权判决被有利地裁决给代理客户而非Vas-Cath。
  • Eggleston诉Lazaridis案(美国专利商标局)。在由对方Motorola(前Eggleston)提起的意图对早期RIM专利提出质疑的专利抵触程序中,代理Research in Motion(前Lazaridis)。判决最终有利于客户RIM,而非Motorola。
  • Voglewede诉Lee案(美国专利商标局)。在由对手Whirlpool(前Vogelwede)提起的意图对LG冰箱专利提出质疑的专利抵触程序中,代理LG(前Lee)。判决最终有利于客户LG,而非Whirlpool。

经验

Home Diagnostics, Inc. v. LifeScan, Inc.

Represented Home Diagnostics in a patent litigation concerning blood glucose meters; securing judgments of noninfringement from two district courts, which were affirmed on appeal.

5:99-cv-21269; 5:01-cv-20725, N.D. Cal., Judges Ware, Trumbull, Seeborg
01-1428, 03-1370, Fed. Cir., Judges Rader, Dyk, Prost, Mayer, Michel

Vas-Cath, Inc. v. University of Missouri

Represented the University of Missouri in a patent interference related to hemodialysis catheters before the USPTO, two district courts, and the Federal Circuit; judgment of priority was awarded in favor of the client and against Vas-Cath.

Int. No. 103988, BPAI, Judge Martin
1:03-cv-01952, D.D.C., Judge Stafford
2:05-cv-00400, W.D. Mo., Judge Fenner
06-1100, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Lourie, Rader

Voglewede v. Lee

Represented LG (Lee) in a patent interference provoked by competitor Whirlpool (Voglewede) attempting to challenge LG refrigerator patents; judgment entered against Whirlpool and in favor of client LG.

Int. No. 105711, BPAI, Judge Lee

Eggleston v. Lazaridis

Represented Research in Motion (Lazaridis) in a patent interference provoked by rival Motorola (Eggleston) attempting to challenge early RIM patents involving certain message "pushing" technology for electronic mail systems; judgment entered against Motorola and in favor of client RIM.

Int. No. 105,700, BPAI, Judge Lee

Certain Pesticides and Products Containing Clothianidin

Defended Syngenta in ITC investigation in which Sumitomo was seeking to exclude Syngenta agricultural products from the U.S.; successfully argued for early termination of the proceeding by the administrative law judge and the full ITC. The Commission terminated Sumitomo's investigation against Syngenta based on a license arbitration agreement.

337-TA-635, ITC, Judge Bullock

Roche Diagnostics Corp. v. Home Diagnostics Inc.

Defended Home Diagnostics, a manufacturer of blood testing equipment, against infringement allegations by competitor. Obtained summary judgment of noninfringement of one patent and a holding of unenforceability of the other patent following a bench trial.

1:04-cv-00358, S.D. Ind., Judges McKinney, Shields

专业见解

Prosecution First Blog

Junior Party Agilent Wins Interference with Sufficiently Corroborated Evidence of Priority of Invention Junior Party Agilent Wins Interference with Sufficiently Corroborated Evidence of Priority of Invention

February 17, 2023

Prosecution First Blog

Estoppel Halts Repeat Examination Estoppel Halts Repeat Examination

February 10, 2023

At the PTAB Blog

No Interference Estoppel to Zynga's IPR Petition No Interference Estoppel to Zynga's IPR Petition

October 7, 2022

At the PTAB Blog

Written Description Support Pre-AIA Scuttles PGR Written Description Support Pre-AIA Scuttles PGR

October 6, 2022

At the PTAB Blog

Petitioner Estoppel Applies: Giving Effect to “Reasonably Could Have Raised” Petitioner Estoppel Applies: Giving Effect to “Reasonably Could Have Raised”

August 29, 2022

Seminar

Global Patent Litigation: Discovery and Measures for Preserving Evidence Global Patent Litigation: Discovery and Measures for Preserving Evidence

May 11, 2022

Munich

More

职业奖项

“Barbara McCurdy…[features] on the national table of the top post-grant experts…McCurdy doesn't play games, but is a grounded adviser with an admirable ability to carefully think through difficult issues and present creative solutions.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“Also highly rated is Barbara Clarke McCurdy, who practises with the utmost integrity, peers acknowledge: ‘She’s always straight with her opponents—judges see this and appreciate it.’ Like many here, McCurdy is a versatile operator capable of emerging victorious from battle in any forum.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 100

“McCurdy can ‘triage issues effectively as a result of her diverse expertise.’”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“Barbara McCurdy…[features] on the national table of the top post-grant experts…McCurdy doesn't play games, but is a grounded adviser with an admirable ability to carefully think through difficult issues and present creative solutions.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“Also highly rated is Barbara Clarke McCurdy, who practises with the utmost integrity, peers acknowledge: ‘She’s always straight with her opponents—judges see this and appreciate it.’ Like many here, McCurdy is a versatile operator capable of emerging victorious from battle in any forum.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 100

“McCurdy can ‘triage issues effectively as a result of her diverse expertise.’”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

新闻

Press Release

32 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers

32 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers

August 17, 2023

Best Lawyers

Press Release

29 Finnegan Attorneys Ranked by Best Lawyers

29 Finnegan Attorneys Ranked by Best Lawyers

August 18, 2022

U.S. News—Best Lawyers

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Clamps Down on Post-IPR Invalidity Arguments Fed. Circ. Clamps Down on Post-IPR Invalidity Arguments

February 11, 2022

Law360

Commentary

More Than Fintiv: What to Know About the PTAB Revision Bill More Than Fintiv: What to Know About the PTAB Revision Bill

October 1, 2021

Law360

Media Mention

Biogen MS Drug Patent Survives Mylan's PTAB Challenge Biogen MS Drug Patent Survives Mylan's PTAB Challenge

February 6, 2020

Law360

Media Mention

Biogen Prevails in Fed. Circ. MS Drug Dispute with Forward Biogen Prevails in Fed. Circ. MS Drug Dispute with Forward

October 24, 2018

Law360
More

会员身份

  • 美国律师协会(American Bar Association)知识产权组(Section of Intellectual Property)
  • 美国知识产权法协会(American Intellectual Property Law Association )
  • 美国联邦法院律师协会(Federal Circuit Bar Association)
Admissions and Education

律师协会

  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • District of Columbia
  • Massachusetts
  • U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
  • U.S. District Court, D. Massachusetts
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
  • Supreme Court of the United States

教育背景

Suffolk University Law School
J.D., cum laude, 1985
Duke University
B.S.E., Mechanical Engineering, 1982

Barbara律师的业务领域

全球知识产权维权、诉讼与审判
美国国际贸易委员会337调查与审判
专利诉讼与审判
审前策略
专利局无效程序
溯源程序
干预程序
PTAB无效程序:双方复审及授权后复审
知识产权申办及组合管理
尽职调查
知识产权组合管理
意见及咨询
专利撰写与申办

Barbara律师的行业领域

电子和信息科技
电子与计算机技术
化学、工业和材料
工业制造
生命科学
医疗设备与诊断
制药
运输和物流
汽车

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP