直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • 新闻
  • 飞翰事实
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • 慈善性法律援助
  • 管理层
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

PTAB's Skyrocketing Petition Rate Starts to Stabilize

February 11, 2016

Law360

Since the creation of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in 2012, the Board has seen a flood of petitions. In just three years, the number of petitions filed jumped from 110 to nearly 1,800. But data shows that the rate is beginning to stabilize. Law360 contacted Finnegan attorney Linda J. Thayer for her thoughts on the rate of petitions at the PTAB over the past few years.

Thayer said, "The PTAB is taking on a vast number of challenges of specious patents and ruling on the validity of patents before substantial costs are expended in district court litigation. It’s playing a substantial role and exactly the role Congress intended for it to play." Thayer also believes that if the Board becomes increasingly efficient in handling AIA proceedings within the one year statutory deadline, more defendants may challenge patents there. "I think the pendency of AIA proceedings will go down, and the PTAB will get to final written decisions sooner. Right now, if a defendant is facing concurrent litigation in Texas or the Eastern District of Virginia, the defendant may think twice before filing an inter partes review because it may not be completed fast enough for the court to grant a stay. But if the pendency of AIA reviews goes down, we could see a small increase in the number of petitions," said Thayer.

Tags

America Invents Act (AIA)

Related Practices

专利局无效程序

PTAB无效程序:双方复审及授权后复审

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Climbs Two Spots on The American Lawyer’s 2026: A-List Runners Up

August 12, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP