直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • 新闻
  • 飞翰事实
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • 慈善性法律援助
  • 管理层
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

MGA Entertainment's Infringement of Laser Board Game Patent Did Not Warrant Trebled Damages

April 29, 2015

IP Law Daily

On April 29, the Federal Circuit ruled that a district court erred in tripling a jury’s damage award against Finnegan client MGA Entertainment. In 2007, Innovention Toys filed suit against MGA Entertainment for infringement of its laser board game patent. Initially, the district court found that the patent was valid and infringed by MGA. MGA appealed and while the Federal Circuit affirmed the infringement ruling, the court vacated and remanded the nonobviousness determination due to the district court excluding key prior-art references and incorrectly determining the level of ordinary skill in the art to be that of a layperson. Following the remand, the jury found that the patent was not obvious and that MGA’s infringement was willful. The jury awarded approximately $1.4 million in lost-profit damages to Innovention and then tripled the damage award because of MGA’s alleged willful infringement. Innovention was also awarded $1.8 million in attorney fees in a separate ruling. On appeal, MGA challenged the willful infringement determination and the Federal Circuit ruled that it was an error for the district court to conclude that MGA’s infringement was willful. The Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s willful infringement ruling and vacated the enhanced damages and attorney fees. 

Tags

damages, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), willful infringement

Related Practices

全球知识产权维权、诉讼与审判

联邦巡回法院和最高法院上诉

Related Industries

消费品

Related News

Commentary

Justices to Side with Generic Drugmakers in Patent Spat, Attorneys Predict

May 5, 2026

Press Release

普为光电在美国专利商标局获得对嘉兴山蒲的全部10项专利的单方再审申请立案决定后,成功取得新泽西联邦地区法院中止专利诉讼裁定

2026年4月28日

Commentary

Permanent Injunction Granted to USA Weightlifting Inc., Enjoining Use of Protected Marks

April 24, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 24, 2026

Commentary

Grambling, After 30 Years, Separates from Pack to Trademark ‘G’

April 15, 2026

Commentary

Patent Cases Down 64% YOY at PTAB, up 70% at ITC in Q1 2026

April 15, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct

April 9, 2026

Media Mention

Asserted Claims of Fleet Vehicle Tracking Patent Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101

March 31, 2026

Media Mention

Patent for Vehicle Tracking and Control System Directed to Ineligible Subject Matter

March 30, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP