直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • 新闻
  • 飞翰事实
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • 慈善性法律援助
  • 管理层
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Fed. Circ. Says PTAB Wrongly Axed PPC Patents in AIA Review

February 22, 2016

Law360

On February 22, 2016 the Federal Circuit ruled that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) erroneously invalidated claims of three of Finnegan client PPC Broadband's coaxial cable technology patents. Corning Optical Communications challenged the claims at the PTAB in 2014 and in an inter partes review proceeding, the Board found that all 78 of PPC Broadband’s patents were obvious. However, the Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB's findings on 49 of the challenged claims, finding that either the board's claim construction was wrong or the prior art did not support its finding.

Finnegan attorney J. Michael Jakes represented PPC Broadband and said that he was "pleased that the Federal Circuit recognized the errors in the PTAB's rulings." He added, "This case is a significant victory for PPC—and for patent owners—because it makes clear that infringers like Corning can no longer assume that the broadest reasonable interpretation standard will excuse their misconduct after-the-fact. Moreover, this case re-emphasizes how the different claim construction standards between the patent office and district courts can cause disparate results. The Supreme Court will be addressing this issue in Cuozzo."

Tags

claim construction, broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI), PPC Broadband Inc., United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

Related Practices

全球知识产权维权、诉讼与审判

联邦巡回法院和最高法院上诉

Related Industries

电子与计算机技术

Related Professionals

J. Michael Jakes
合伙人
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4045
Email

Related News

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP