In Suprema Inc. et al. v. International Trade Commission, a split Federal Circuit ruled that the ITC has the authority to police induced infringement claims. This closes loopholes and prevents importers from bringing infringing products into the United States. The decision reversed a 2013 precedential ruling, which found that Section 337 of the Tariff Act only covers products that directly infringe U.S. patents at the time of importation. Finnegan attorney Eric J. Fues filed the amicus brief on behalf of the International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association. He said that the Federal Circuit's decision settles the question of whether a solution for the indirect infringement of method claims can be pursued at the ITC. He believes that the Federal Circuit's split decision may lead to an appeal at the Supreme Court.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), International Trade Commission (ITC)
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.