In Suprema Inc. et al. v. International Trade Commission, a split Federal Circuit ruled that the ITC has the authority to police induced infringement claims. This closes loopholes and prevents importers from bringing infringing products into the United States. The decision reversed a 2013 precedential ruling, which found that Section 337 of the Tariff Act only covers products that directly infringe U.S. patents at the time of importation. Finnegan attorney Eric J. Fues filed the amicus brief on behalf of the International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association. He said that the Federal Circuit's decision settles the question of whether a solution for the indirect infringement of method claims can be pursued at the ITC. He believes that the Federal Circuit's split decision may lead to an appeal at the Supreme Court.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), International Trade Commission (ITC)
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.