直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • 実績

偽造/グレーマーケット製品

About

模倣品への対応

模造品やグレーマーケット商品は、驚くべき速度で増加しており、年間数十億ドルの産業損失を引き起こしています。これらによりクライアントの商標が脅威にさらされた場合、弊所は、メーカー及び販売会社に対して偽造品やグレーマーケット商品の市場流入を阻止するための措置を講じます。弊所は、米国各地の裁判所において、一方的差押え、一時的差止命令、予備的差止命令を含む緊急差止命令を勝ち取ってきました。また、ヨーロッパ、イギリス、アメリカにおける知的財産法に関する業務により、迅速かつ効果的にグローバルブランドを保護するプログラムを実施することが可能です。

Everyone in this practice

実績

Maglula, Ltd. v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
Represented Maglula Ltd. in a one-of-a-kind district court litigation including patent, trademark, and copyright claims over Maglula’s assertions that Amazon sold counterfeit consumer products. After the Court issued an order (i) denying Amazon’s motion for summary judgment; (ii) finding “Amazon's attempts to avoid liability … will have minimal impact before a jury”; (iii) reflecting the Court’s belief that "not [] even the most persuasive presentation of Amazon’s evidence would make one iota of difference to a jury”; and (iv) requiring the parties to engage in mediation, the parties entered into an agreement and the case was dismissed.

1:19-cv-01570, E.D. Va., Judge O'Grady

Patagonia, Inc. v. Chelsea International Inc.
Obtained a temporary restraining order and asset freeze order against entities selling counterfeit apparel products and secured an order for the seizure of counterfeit product from multiple locations in California and New York.

2:16-cv-08030, C.D. Cal., Judges Stevenson, Walter

LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. v. Xiaowen
Obtained a temporary restraining order and asset freeze order against 22 defendants accused of selling counterfeit mobile headsets.  Secured an award of over $168 million in damages and obtained default judgment against 17 defendants for trademark counterfeiting, trademark infringement, trademark dilution, false advertising, unfair competition, and cybersquatting.  Obtained an award of over $380,000 in attorneys' fees.

3:16-cv-01162, S.D. Cal., Judges Sammartino, Stormes

Bridgestone Brands, LLC v. Apollo Auto Sales & Service, Inc.; Katy Freeway Tire & Automotive Inc.
Prevailed on summary judgment against entities and their owners who unlawfully used the FIRESTONE, FIRESTONE COMPLETE AUTO CARE, and BRIDGESTONE marks to offer automotive services, securing an order recognizing the fame of the FIRESTONE mark.

3:15-cv-00857, M.D. Tenn., Judges Campbell, Holmes, McCalla
4:15-cv-02274, S.D. Tex., Judge Werlein

Chapman Cubine, Adams + Hussey v. Sirius XM Radio
Obtained consent judgment and favorable settlement amount against direct mail advertiser who created counterfeit of client’s proprietary envelope designs.

1:15-cv-01530, E.D. Va., Judge Ellis

Defending the integrity of the American Petroleum Institute's engine oil certification program
Finnegan has successfully defended API and its engine oil certification program in numerous district court cases and before the TTAB. In one instance, we launched a multipart, simultaneous attack on twelve defendants, filing counterfeiting, trademark infringement, and false advertising claims in two different federal courts. We obtained multiple preliminary and permanent injunctions with each defendant agreeing to settlement. In another case, defendants falsely claimed their engine oil was licensed by API to use the API engine oil quality certification marks, which denotes an oil meets the stringent API engine oil performance standards. Ultimately, the defendants admitted to counterfeiting API’s engine oil quality certification marks and making false performance claims; they agreed to a 10-year ban on bottling or marketing any engine oil for diesel engines and for use in gasoline engines in cars, vans, trucks, and motorcycles; and they paid API’s litigation costs.

More

Insights

Conference

California Lawyers Association 48th IP Institute

March 6-8, 2025

Long Beach

WTR Live: Brand Strategy Summit Europe 2024

March 12-13, 2024

London

Ad Law Buzz Blog

FTC Reminds Businesses that “Made in USA” Means What It Says

October 3, 2023

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Ninth Circuit Weighs in on Willful Blindness and the Knowledge Needed for Contributory Trademark Infringement

September 21, 2023

Seminar

When You Meet Goliath

June 21, 2022

Tel-Aviv

Articles

Nike’s Trademark Fight Against StockX Moves Offline

May 18, 2022

More

最新情報

Award/Ranking

World IP Review Insights Recognizes Two Finnegan Partners in Its 2024 USA Trademarks Rankings

December 18, 2024

Announcement

World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners as Global Leaders

October 17, 2022

Commentary

Top Takeaways from Docket Navigator’s 2021 Year in Review

February 2, 2022

Commentary

A Case Over the Sale of Counterfeits on Amazon May Have Implications for Fashion

January 7, 2022

Commentary

New Process to Nix Unused Trademarks Leads 2022 USPTO Priorities

December 30, 2021

Media Mention

Victory! Maglula Defeats Amazon in Counterfeit Claims

December 8, 2021

More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP