直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • 実績

消費財

Consumer_Products_image

About

消費財 is part of our work in 消費財・サービス.

日用品の知的財産を保護する

消費財市場は常に拡大の一途をたどっています。メーカーは、スマートで効率がよく、健康的で環境に優しく、オシャレでありながら面白さもあるといった真新しい商品の開発に注力しており、企業が新技術の発明、製造、ブランド化を推し進めることで市場が活発化しています。消費者の商品選択のフィールドは世界に広がっており、陳列棚、マインドシェア、顧客ロイヤリティをめぐる熾烈な競争が起きています。こういった中で、知的財産及びブランド・バリューを保護することは事業の長期的成功に必要不可欠です。弊所は、化粧品、食品・飲料、健康・美容、サプリメント、スポーツ用品、電子機器等、消費者向け製品分野で豊富な経験を有しています。あらゆる消費財業界のクライアントと実績があり、製品開発や改良スピードの速さ、消費者ニーズの変化、強固なブランド力の重要性を深く理解しています。

法律・科学・技術を理解する

弊所は、知的財産業務をフルサービスで提供する法律事務所として、消費財業界のフォーチュン 100企業、グローバル 1000企業、公的機関等を含むあらゆる事業規模のクライアントを支援しています。耐久財・非耐久財及び関連サービス等を含んだ小売、消費者製品において、豊富な経験を有しています。

  • アパレル、靴、アクセサリー
  • 自動車・二輪車
  • 本、出版
  • 家庭用電化製品及びソフトウェア
  • 化粧品・健康食品
  • 食品・飲料
  • 家庭用品
  • メディア、エンターテイメント
  • 医薬品
  • レクリエーション、スポーツ用品
  • タイヤ・自動車部品

業務内容

  • 米国及び海外での特許取得による包括的IPポートフォリオの構築及び管理
  • 新技術に関する鑑定書作成及び継続的なカウンセリングの提供
  • 競合状況を分析し、他社の知的財産権に抵触することなく新製品開発が自由に行えるかをアドバイス
  • ライセンシング・プログラムの構築
  • デューディリジェンス調査の実施
  • 訴訟、その他紛争解決手段による侵害への対応
  • 企業秘密保護に関するアドバイスの提供及び不正流用訴訟
  • 商標・著作権登録サービス及び広告保護

この産業分野の弁護士等

実績

Carrum Technologies, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al.

Obtained complete victory against Carrum on appeal of the District of Delaware’s claim construction to the Federal Circuit following Carrum’s stipulation of non-infringement under the claim construction, thereby exonerating BMW’s ACC system, first sold in 2000, against Carrum’s 2004 patents. Invalidated several asserted claims through post-grant efforts before the U.S. Patent Office, including IPRs and EPRs, and pursued claims through proceedings before the Eastern District of Virginia to vindicate BMW’s patent challenges.

1:18-cv-01645, D. Del., Judge Andrews
21-1435, 24-1480, Fed. Cir., Judges Clevenger, Cunningham, Lourie, Moore, Prost, Taranto
IPR2019-00902, -00903, -00904, -00905, -00927, 00928, PTAB, Judges Browne, Scanlon, Tornquist
90/019,010, CRU

Certain Digital Media Devices, Including Televisions, Blu-Ray Disc Players, Home Theater Systems, Tablets and Mobile Phones, Components Thereof and Associated Software

Represented LG Electronics in Investigation concerning certain media technologies in smartphones and televisions, home theater systems, Blu-ray disc players, and tablets. Following trial, all four asserted patents were found not infringed and/or invalid.

337-TA-882, ITC, Judge Shaw

Strategic patent support led to startup acquisition

Advised a cycling-focused startup on the preparation and prosecution of a foundational patent application, which played a key role in its acquisition by a global leader in GPS-enabled technology across fitness, outdoor, marine, automotive, and aviation markets.

Secured global settlement for video game company

Resolved litigation spanning three continents faced by video game company by negotiating a global settlement. 

B/E Aerospace v. Safran Cabin Inc. f/k/a C&D Zodiac, Inc.
Represented B/E Aerospace in pursuing infringement claims against Safran and defending multiple post-grant challenges by Safran at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, for design of aircraft monuments. Secured favorable settlement of all claims.

2:19-cv-01480, C.D. Cal., Judge Wu

TBL Licensing, LLC v. Katherine K. Vidal et al.
Argued on appeal at the Fourth Circuit that a trademark application for the design of Timberland’s classic 6-inch “Icon” boot should not have been refused by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). The appeal is pending.

23-1150, 4th Cir.

More

Insights

Articles

How Low Can You Go? Courts Lower Marking Defense Burden, Raising Patent Damages Risks

June 29, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Redesigns Done Right at the ITC: Federal Circuit Affirms ITC Determination of Noninfringement of Redesigned Products

June 26, 2026

Articles

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update, March 2026

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: March 2026

May 4, 2026

Articles

Prosecution History Estoppel: Navigating Limits on Equivalents in Patent Litigation

March/April 2026

Articles

The UPC - Only Three Years Old and Already Leading

The UPC - Only Three Years Old and Already Leading

March 18, 2026

Articles

Why Fashion Brands are Doubling Down on US Utility Patents

Why Fashion Brands are Doubling Down on US Utility Patents

March 10, 2026

More

最新情報

Commentary

IP Notebook: Hugging It Out

June 10, 2026

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Commentary

Taylor Swift 'The Life of a Showgirl' Case Heads to Key May Hearing

April 22, 2026

Commentary

Patent Cases Down 64% YOY at PTAB, up 70% at ITC in Q1 2026

April 15, 2026

Commentary

Valve’s ‘Patent Troll’ Verdict Points to Laws, Licenses as Tools

February 26, 2026

Commentary

Albright Stresses IP Sovereignty in Allowing BMW Injunction

February 13, 2026

More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP