直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
Barbara C. McCurdy
パートナー
More
vCard
  • 901 New York Avenue, NW
  • Washington, DC 20001-4413
+1 202 408 4047
barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com

Barbara C. McCurdy

パートナー

  • +1 202 408 4047 +1 202 408 4047
  • barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com
  • 901 New York Avenue, NW
  • Washington, DC 20001-4413
  • vCard

特許権利化、権利行使、抗弁で25年以上の経験を持つ。中心業務は特許訴訟、特許カウンセリング、及び米国特許商標庁(USPTO)での特許当事者系手続。米国連邦地方裁判所、連邦巡回控訴裁判所での控訴審、国際貿易委員会(ITC)での米国関税法337条手続、USPTOでの特許当事者系手続、等を主席弁護士として担当。

これまで20件以上のUSPTO特許審判部(PTAB)特許当事者系手続を主席弁護士として手掛ける。特許性及び発明優先権に関する特許当事者系手続に加え、特許インターフェアレンスを定める特許法291条に基づくUSPTO審判部の決定及び地裁申立案件をレビューする、特許法146条の地裁訴訟でも主席弁護士を務める。また、USPTO特許付与後レビュー手続、地裁訴訟、ITCの戦略的相互作用をテーマに世界各地で講演を行なう。

 Intellectual Asset Management誌でワシントンD.C.エリアにおける一流の特許訴訟弁護士として選出。また、米国内で付与後レビュー手続を扱う一流の弁護士として評価された。網羅する技術分野は幅広く、コンピューター、ソフトウェア、半導体、医療機器、化学、製薬など多岐に亘る。

戦略的権利化手続、有効性及び侵害の鑑定書作成、特許ポートフォリオ管理、訴訟戦略、等幅広い分野でカウンセリングサービスを提供。クライアントの事業目標に沿った戦略構築を提案しており、新規技術領域で特許ポートフォリオを確立するにあたっての助言、IPランドスケープを考慮した知財戦略で取るべきポジションの立案、技術の買収やライセンスについての助言、攻撃的・防衛的訴訟戦略の立案等、を含む。また、ロースクール生への講義を数多く担当。USPTO特許当事者系手続に関する弁理士向け講義も手掛ける。

3年間弊所のマネージング・パートナーを務めた後、弊所のチェアマンを務めた。

実績

Home Diagnostics, Inc. v. LifeScan, Inc.

Represented Home Diagnostics in a patent litigation concerning blood glucose meters; securing judgments of noninfringement from two district courts, which were affirmed on appeal.

5:99-cv-21269; 5:01-cv-20725, N.D. Cal., Judges Ware, Trumbull, Seeborg
01-1428, 03-1370, Fed. Cir., Judges Rader, Dyk, Prost, Mayer, Michel

Vas-Cath, Inc. v. University of Missouri

Represented the University of Missouri in a patent interference related to hemodialysis catheters before the USPTO, two district courts, and the Federal Circuit; judgment of priority was awarded in favor of the client and against Vas-Cath.

Int. No. 103988, BPAI, Judge Martin
1:03-cv-01952, D.D.C., Judge Stafford
2:05-cv-00400, W.D. Mo., Judge Fenner
06-1100, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Lourie, Rader

Voglewede v. Lee

Represented LG (Lee) in a patent interference provoked by competitor Whirlpool (Voglewede) attempting to challenge LG refrigerator patents; judgment entered against Whirlpool and in favor of client LG.

Int. No. 105711, BPAI, Judge Lee

Eggleston v. Lazaridis

Represented Research in Motion (Lazaridis) in a patent interference provoked by rival Motorola (Eggleston) attempting to challenge early RIM patents involving certain message "pushing" technology for electronic mail systems; judgment entered against Motorola and in favor of client RIM.

Int. No. 105,700, BPAI, Judge Lee

Certain Pesticides and Products Containing Clothianidin

Defended Syngenta in ITC investigation in which Sumitomo was seeking to exclude Syngenta agricultural products from the U.S.; successfully argued for early termination of the proceeding by the administrative law judge and the full ITC. The Commission terminated Sumitomo's investigation against Syngenta based on a license arbitration agreement.

337-TA-635, ITC, Judge Bullock

Roche Diagnostics Corp. v. Home Diagnostics Inc.

Defended Home Diagnostics, a manufacturer of blood testing equipment, against infringement allegations by competitor. Obtained summary judgment of noninfringement of one patent and a holding of unenforceability of the other patent following a bench trial.

1:04-cv-00358, S.D. Ind., Judges McKinney, Shields

Insights

Prosecution First Blog

Junior Party Agilent Wins Interference with Sufficiently Corroborated Evidence of Priority of Invention Junior Party Agilent Wins Interference with Sufficiently Corroborated Evidence of Priority of Invention

February 17, 2023

Prosecution First Blog

Estoppel Halts Repeat Examination Estoppel Halts Repeat Examination

February 10, 2023

At the PTAB Blog

No Interference Estoppel to Zynga's IPR Petition No Interference Estoppel to Zynga's IPR Petition

October 7, 2022

At the PTAB Blog

Written Description Support Pre-AIA Scuttles PGR Written Description Support Pre-AIA Scuttles PGR

October 6, 2022

At the PTAB Blog

Petitioner Estoppel Applies: Giving Effect to “Reasonably Could Have Raised” Petitioner Estoppel Applies: Giving Effect to “Reasonably Could Have Raised”

August 29, 2022

Seminar

Global Patent Litigation: Discovery and Measures for Preserving Evidence Global Patent Litigation: Discovery and Measures for Preserving Evidence

May 11, 2022

Munich

More

Professional Recognition

“Barbara McCurdy…[features] on the national table of the top post-grant experts…McCurdy doesn't play games, but is a grounded adviser with an admirable ability to carefully think through difficult issues and present creative solutions.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“Also highly rated is Barbara Clarke McCurdy, who practises with the utmost integrity, peers acknowledge: ‘She’s always straight with her opponents—judges see this and appreciate it.’ Like many here, McCurdy is a versatile operator capable of emerging victorious from battle in any forum.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 100

“McCurdy can ‘triage issues effectively as a result of her diverse expertise.’”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“Barbara McCurdy…[features] on the national table of the top post-grant experts…McCurdy doesn't play games, but is a grounded adviser with an admirable ability to carefully think through difficult issues and present creative solutions.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“Also highly rated is Barbara Clarke McCurdy, who practises with the utmost integrity, peers acknowledge: ‘She’s always straight with her opponents—judges see this and appreciate it.’ Like many here, McCurdy is a versatile operator capable of emerging victorious from battle in any forum.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 100

“McCurdy can ‘triage issues effectively as a result of her diverse expertise.’”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

最新情報

Press Release

32 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers

32 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers

August 17, 2023

Best Lawyers

Press Release

29 Finnegan Attorneys Ranked by Best Lawyers

29 Finnegan Attorneys Ranked by Best Lawyers

August 18, 2022

U.S. News—Best Lawyers

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Clamps Down on Post-IPR Invalidity Arguments Fed. Circ. Clamps Down on Post-IPR Invalidity Arguments

February 11, 2022

Law360

Commentary

More Than Fintiv: What to Know About the PTAB Revision Bill More Than Fintiv: What to Know About the PTAB Revision Bill

October 1, 2021

Law360

Media Mention

Biogen MS Drug Patent Survives Mylan's PTAB Challenge Biogen MS Drug Patent Survives Mylan's PTAB Challenge

February 6, 2020

Law360

Media Mention

Biogen Prevails in Fed. Circ. MS Drug Dispute with Forward Biogen Prevails in Fed. Circ. MS Drug Dispute with Forward

October 24, 2018

Law360
More

Professional Activities

  • 米国法曹協会(知的財産部門)
  • 米国知的財産権法協会
  • 連邦巡回控訴裁判所法曹協会
Admissions and Education

Admissions

  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • District of Columbia
  • Massachusetts
  • U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
  • U.S. District Court, D. Massachusetts
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Education

Suffolk University Law School
J.D., cum laude, 1985
Duke University
B.S.E., Mechanical Engineering, 1982

Barbara's Practices

グローバルな知的財産権利の執行、訴訟、および裁判
ITCによる関税法337条調査手続および裁判
特許訴訟および裁判
公判前戦略
特許庁における無効審判
冒認手続
インターフェアレンス
PTABにおける無効手続:当事者系レビューおよび特許付与後レビュー
特許出願及びポートフォリオ管理
デューディリジェンス
知財ポートフォリオ管理
鑑定及びカウンセリング
特許明細書作成及び出願手続

Barbara's Industries

電子・情報技術
Electrical and Computer Technology
化学・工業・材料
製造業
ライフサイエンス
Medical Device and Diagnostics
製薬
運輸・物流
自動車

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP