A federal judge has denied a bid by Sandoz Inc. for an interlocutory appeal of a claims construction ruling that resulted in partial summary judgment for Wyeth in its patent infringement suit over a proposed generic version of depression and anxiety drug Effexor®. Judge James C. Denver III of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina ruled Wednesday that Sandoz failed to meet the standard necessary for an interlocutory appeal. In March, Sandoz asked Judge Denver to immediately certify his order granting summary judgment to Wyeth for an interlocutory appeal, saying that seven different courts have examined Wyeth's patent claims and come to different conclusions on how they should be constructed. In denying the motion for appeal, Judge Denver found that many more courts had adopted the broader construction of the term ‘extended release formulation’, so “no substantial ground for difference of opinion exists as to whether 'extended release formulation' is limited to specific ingredients,” such that an interlocutory appeal was warranted. The judge also ruled that because the issues raised by Sandoz were not controlling questions of law, an interlocutory appeal would not materially advance the litigation. Wyeth is represented by Finnegan.
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked
May 28, 2026
Commentary
May 20, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Partner Antje Brambrink Shortlisted for Women in Business Law EMEA Award
May 13, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination
May 11, 2026
Award/Ranking
Associates Rank Finnegan “Best of the Best” in BTI Associate Satisfaction Survey
May 7, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.