直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
  • 最新情報
  • Finneganについて
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • プロボノ活動
  • 事務所運営管理
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Oil Group Beats Trademark Suit Over ‘Choose Energy’ Site

April 9, 2015

Law360

On April 9, a California federal judge ruled in favor of Finnegan client American Petroleum Institute (API), dismissing Choose Energy’s federal trademark claim against API. Choose Energy owns the domain name “chooseenergy.com”. API registered the domain name “chooseenergy.org” for its 2014 election campaign called “Choose Energy,” designed to encourage voters to elect candidates who were in support of oil and natural gas reserves. Choose Energy filed a preliminary injunction in October, claiming that API’s political activity constitutes a service under the Lanham Act, and therefore will cause customer confusion. Choose Energy sought to shut down API’s website and make API pay damages for allegedly damaging its brand. The judge refused to issue the preliminary injunction and allowed API to keep their website live until Election Day. In the recent ruling, the judge cited that the two parties are not competitors and that API’s website is protected political speech.

Tags

Lanham Act, likelihood of confusion

Related Practices

商標及びブランド管理

Related Professionals

B. Brett Heavner
パートナー
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4073
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Partner Antje Brambrink Shortlisted for Women in Business Law EMEA Award

May 13, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 28, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 24, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Ends Anti-Suit Injunction Appeal in BMW Case

April 20, 2026

Commentary

‘Efficiency Enhancers, Not Revenue Disruptors’: Lawyers Analyse USPTO’s AI Trademark Tools

April 17, 2026

Commentary

Grambling, After 30 Years, Separates from Pack to Trademark ‘G’

April 15, 2026

Media Mention

Judge Lends Ear to Audi's Caesar Analogy to End Patent Suit

March 26, 2026

Commentary

How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Be an Active Participant,' Say Karthik Kumar and Frank DeCosta of Finnegan

March 6, 2026

Press Release

Judge Albright Issues Final Written Ruling Granting BMW Anti-Suit Injunction: Landmark Decision Reinforces Exclusive U.S. Adjudication of U.S. Patent Disputes

February 13, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP