直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
  • 最新情報
  • Finneganについて
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • プロボノ活動
  • 事務所運営管理
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics, and How the Board Handles Remands

January 18, 2017

Managing Intellectual Property

In its January 18, 2017 article, Managing Intellectual Property took a close look at Finnegan's AIA Blog posts to examine Federal Circuit Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) appeal statistics, as well as what parties can expect from cases that are remanded.

As of the start of 2017, the Federal Circuit had decided 155 PTAB appeals from inter partes review (IPR) and covered business method (CBM) reviews. In about 77% of those cases, the court had affirmed the PTAB on every issue and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in about 8% of the cases. As of January 1, approximately 53% of cases were issued as Rule 36.

In a December blog post, Finnegan discussed what can be expected from the PTAB on remand. Since there are no specified deadlines for remanded cases, it has not been clear as to how remands will be treated. So far, once the Federal Circuit’s mandate has issued, jurisdiction returns to the Board and a teleconference with the PTAB may occur within a week to a month after the mandate issues. Then, the PTAB authorizes the parties to submit briefs explaining the impact of the Federal Circuit's ruling. Briefing by the petitioner and patent owner typically occurs at the same time, but sometimes it is staggered to give the patent owner an extra week. Parties can expect a three to six month wait from the date of the Federal Circuit's mandate for the PTAB to issue its new final written decision on remand.

Tags

remand, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

Related Practices

特許庁における無効審判

PTABにおける無効手続:当事者系レビューおよび特許付与後レビュー

連邦巡回控訴裁判所および最高裁判所

Related News

Press Release

BMW AG Secures Complete Victory at Federal Circuit as Onesta IP, LLC Appeal is Dismissed and Costs Awarded to BMW

April 20, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Ends Anti-Suit Injunction Appeal in BMW Case

April 20, 2026

Commentary

Patent Cases Down 64% YOY at PTAB, up 70% at ITC in Q1 2026

April 15, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct

April 9, 2026

Commentary

Squires’ Latest PTAB Memo Seeks to Boost U.S. Manufacturing with New Discretionary Factors

March 18, 2026

Commentary

Top Patent Officials to Review Sanofi's Double Patenting Win

March 5, 2026

Commentary

Squires Sinks 2 PTAB Challenges, Including 1 He Instituted

February 20, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Team Secures $240M Jury Verdict After PTAB Success

February 3, 2026

Commentary

Circuit-By-Circuit Guide to 2025's Most Memorable Moments

December 17, 2025

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP