直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Derivations

About

An exception to the first-to-file AIA provisions
Derivation proceedings before the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (PTAB) at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provide an exception to the otherwise absolute first-to-file provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA). For patent applications having an effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013, the derivation proceeding is available to an inventor who believes that an earlier-to-file patent applicant derived the invention without authorization. Derivation addresses originality—who invented the subject matter at issue. Finnegan frequently advises clients on resolving inventorship disputes.

From helping clients assess the conception and communication of inventions, which are key components of establishing derivation, to counseling on the interplay between derivation, contract, and trade secret proceedings, we work with inventors to compellingly tell their invention origin stories. With extensive experience in PTAB and interference proceedings, Finnegan attorneys stand ready to prepare and litigate petitions for derivation.

Contacts

Timothy P. McAnulty
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4348
Email
Jeffrey C. Totten
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4232
Email
Timothy P. McAnulty
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4348
Email
Jeffrey C. Totten
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4232
Email

Everyone in this practice

Experience

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP v. Xcential Corp. et al.
Analyzed inventorship dispute, and prepared derivation petition regarding unauthorized filing of patent application by potential vendor. Counseled client on derivation petitions and procedures, as well as interplay with contract and trade secret claims.

DER2022-00004, PTAB, Judges Arbes, Lee, Kennedy

Insights

Conference

IPOwners Spring Summit 2026

March 18-19,2026

Washington

Podcasts

Inventorship & the AIA: The Federal Circuit’s First Derivation Decision - Part 1

October 8, 2025

Webinar

Challenging Pending Patent Applications: When, Where, and What Type

November 13, 2023

Webinar

At the PTAB Blog

Spotted: The Rare AIA Derivation Proceeding!

April 22, 2022

Podcasts

Derivation Proceedings

November 20, 2019

IP Updates

USPTO Releases Second Update to PTAB Trial Practice Guide, Part 2

July 23, 2019

More

News

Media Mention

4 Takeaways From PTAB's First Derivation Decision

March 27, 2019

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP