Experience
U.S. Department of Justice
Windbond Electronics Corporation
Finnegan represented Winbond Electronics Corporation in several antitrust cases filed by the U.S. Department of Justice and by class-action plaintiffs in numerous states and Canadian provinces. The allegations involved price fixing in the DRAM industry. Finnegan successfully showed that Winbond was not involved in the discussions that formed the basis of the Justice Department investigation, and therefore negotiated settlements in most of the cases, either at no cost to Winbond or for very nominal settlement amounts.
U.S. Department of Justice v. Windbond Electronics Corporation, 4:02-ml-01486, N.D. Cal., Judge Hamilton
Goodman v. Winbond Electronics Corp.
Winbond Electronics Corp.
Integrated Circuit Systems v. Winbond Electronics
Integrated Circuit Systems
Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. v. Winbond Electronics
Winbond Electronics
Barco NV and Barco, Inc. v. Vivitek Corp. and Delta Electronics, Inc.
Delta Electronics, Inc.; Vivitek Corporation
Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc.
LG Electronics, Inc.
LG Electronics, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd.
LG Electronics
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.