直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Finnegan defends architectural work in copyright infringement case for Lessard Design

Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P.

Lessard Design, Inc.

In a copyright infringement case involving an architectural work, plaintiff Humphreys & Partners Architects sued Finnegan client Lessard Design, Inc., alleging that Lessard’s apartment building infringed Humphreys’ condominium building design. Besides being high-rises, Humphreys alleged both buildings included two elevator cores connected by a fire or service corridor; a barbell-shaped floor plan thicker on the ends and thinner in the middle; corner units with diagonal entry access; and projecting elements at the cornice of the roof line. Lessard successfully moved for summary judgment for non-infringement in the Eastern District of Virginia, which found that none of the architectural elements asserted by Humphreys against Lessard were individually protectable. The court further ruled that even assuming the overall arrangement of those elements was protectable, the buildings were no more similar “than any two randomly selected high-rise multi-family projects would be based on building code regulations and industry standard practices.” Humphreys then appealed to the Fourth Circuit, which affirmed the lower court’s ruling. The Eastern District of Virginia (E.D. Va.) also granted attorneys fees and costs to Lessard as the prevailing party.

Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. v. Lessard Design, Inc., 1:13-cv-00433, E.D. Va., Judges Buchanan, Ellis

Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. v. Lessard Design, Inc., 14-2030, 4th Cir., Judges Duncan, Harris, Shedd

Related Practices

Copyright

Related Experiences

Software code for video game controllers developed in China is protected in a copyright infringement claim

SplitFish AG, SplitFish Gameware, Inc., and Nabon Corp.

Finnegan client UTC defeats Rolls-Royce's jet engine patent infringement claim

United Technologies Corporation

Versata v. Lee

SAP (intervenor)

Civix-DDI, LLC V. Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc.

Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc.

Finnegan wins VAGISIL trademark battle

Combe Inc.

Finnegan client Maglula delivers crushing blow to Amazon’s arbitration practices over counterfeit products

Maglula, Ltd.

Successfully defending GTECH against infringement accusations

GTECH Corp.

Hyundai Electronics v. Siemens AG

Hyundai Electronics

BTG Int'l Ltd. v. Kappos

BTG International Ltd.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP