直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Proving first-to-invent status in interference involving metal alloys

Allied Signal

Allegheny Ludlum Co.

We represented Allegheny Ludlum Co. against Allied-Signal in the area of iron-boron-silicon amorphous metal alloys. Despite having junior party status, we proved that the Allegheny inventors were the first to invent and the PTO ruled that they were entitled to the award of priority. Allied-Signal brought a Section 146 action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. The parties settled the case after discovery and trial, but before a decision by the court.

Allied Signal v. Allegheny Ludlum Co., 3:88-cv-00199, D. Conn., Judge Squatrito

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Chemical

Energy

Related Experiences

High-profile interferences determine who was first to discover the AIDS virus and to invent a method of detecting HIV infection

Institut Pasteur

Finnegan client LG Electronics obtains award of priority in interference involving refrigerator dispensers

LG Electronics Inc.

Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products*

Iles v. Wanlass

Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC

Interference decision reversed in favor of Phillips’s defibrillator patent

Koninklijke Philips Electronics

D’Amour v. Fisk

Geron Corp.

University of Western Australia v. Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden

Sarepta Therapeutics

PQ Corp. v. Johnson Matthey PLC

PQ Corp.

Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Caavo Inc.

Caavo Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP