Experience
Innolux Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc.
Represented Innolux in suit for breach of IP indemnity against Applied Materials; developed offensive strategies to secure a favorable settlement and business resolution less than three months after filing of complaint.
Innolux Corporation v. Applied Materials, Inc., 5:15-cv-01777, N.D. Cal., Judge Koh
Medtronic Vascular Inc. v. Abbott Vascular, Inc.
Abbott Vascular, Inc.
Microchip Technology Incorporated v. Nuvoton Technology Corporation America et al.
Nuvoton Technology Corporation America et al.
Bridgestone Brands, LLC et al. v. Dastgah
Bridgestone Brands, LLC
Abbott Laboratories v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Abbott Laboratories
Koninklijke Philips NV et al. v. Tongfang Global Inc. et al.
Koninklijke Philips NV et al.
Uniloc USA Inc. et al. v. LG Electronics USA Inc. et al.
LG Electronics USA Inc. et al.
AGIS Software Development, LLC v. ZTE USA Inc. et al.
ZTE USA, Inc.
Uniloc USA Inc et al. v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al.
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.