Experience
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Amerlux, LLC
Represented Philips to enforce its LED patents as part of its LED licensing program. The case ended in a settlement.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Amerlux, LLC, 1:15-cv-13086, D. Mass., Judge Sorokin
Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al. v. Schreder Lighting LLC, et al.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al. v. Roy-CSL Lighting, Inc.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Haier America Trading, L.L.C. v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. PixelRange, Inc.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips NV et al. v. Tongfang Global Inc. et al.
Koninklijke Philips NV et al.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. iGuzzini Lighting USA, Ltd., et al.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
CardioNet LLC et al. v. InfoBionic, Inc.
CardioNet LLC et al.
iRobot Corporation v. SharkNinja Operating LLC et al.
SharkNinja Operating LLC et al.
Technical Consumer Products, Inc. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.