Experience
General Electric Co.
United Technologies Corp.
Represented patent owner in a series of inter partes review challenges and related appeals to pioneering technology on next-generation aircraft engines. Successfully secured non-institution of several proceedings and claims, and in several cases that proceeded to final written decision, persuaded the Board to confirm some or all of the challenged claims.
General Electric Co. v. United Technologies Corp., IPR2016-00855, -00862, -01286, -01287, IPR2017-00425, 00428, -00999, IPR2019-01489, PTAB, Judges Jung, Rice, Wood, Daniels, Weatherly, Hoskins
General Electric Co. v. United Technologies Corp.
United Technologies Corp.
Toyota Motor Corporation v. General Electric Co./GE Hybrid Technologies, LLC.
Toyota Motor Corporation
Securus Technologies, Inc. v. Global Tel*Link Corp.
Securus Technologies, Inc.
General Electric Co. v. Wilkins
Thomas A. Wilkins
General Electric Co. v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Limited
FedEx Corp.
ITC victory keeps U.S. market open for Mitsubishi wind turbines
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
Medtronic PLC
Feit Electric Company, Inc. v. Philips Lighting North America Corp.
Philips Lighting North America Corp.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.