Experience
Firestone Industrial Products
Morrow
Defendant used the infringing marks AIR RIDE PRO, AIR RIDE PROFESSIONAL, and other AIR RIDE-formative marks for air-spring businesses competing with Firestone.
Firestone Industrial Products v. Morrow, 1:07-cv-00410, S.D. Ind., Judges Barker, Lawrence
Bridgestone Firestone v. FleetPride
Bridgestone Firestone
Delta Faucet Company v. Globe Union Industrial Corp. et al.
Globe Union Industrial Corp.
American Petroleum Institute v. Bullseye Automotive Products
American Petroleum Institute
Bridgestone Firestone v. ContiTech
Bridgestone Firestone
Summary judgment allows Home Diagnostics Inc. (HDI) to meet the needs of diabetics
Home Diagnostics Inc. (HDI)
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Apotex Inc.
Eli Lilly and Company
Mobileye, Inc.
ArjoHuntleigh
Eli Lilly and Company v. Sicor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Eli Lilly and Company
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.