直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Eli Lilly and Company v. Sicor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Eli Lilly and Company

Sicor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Represented Eli Lilly in ANDA litigation to prevent generic competition for anti-cancer drug Gemzar®. One patent found valid after trial, recovery on second patent barred by Sun decision. Affirmed on appeal.

Eli Lilly and Company v. Sicor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1:06-cv-00238, S.D. Ind., Judges Barker, McVicker Lynch, Magnus-Stinson

Related Professionals

Alissa K. Lipton
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4293
Email
William B. Raich, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4210
Email

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Related Experiences

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Apotex Inc.

Eli Lilly and Company

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Wockhardt Ltd.

Eli Lilly and Company

Eli Lilly and Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Eli Lilly and Company

Eli Lilly and Company v. Perrigo Co.

Eli Lilly and Company

Eli Lilly and Co. wins challenge to patents covering its osteoporosis drug, Evista®

Eli Lilly and Company

Sun Pharmaceutical Inds. v. Eli Lilly and Co. 

Eli Lilly and Company

Finnegan represented Eli Lilly on first genetically engineered biologic in the United States

Eli Lilly and Company

When the patent for Zyprexa® and $2 billion in annual revenue were on the line, Eli Lilly turned to Finnegan

Eli Lilly and Company

With hundreds of millions of dollars at stake in revolutionary technology involving genetic engineering, Finnegan prevails for Eli Lilly

Eli Lilly

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP