直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Finnegan protects Subaru’s mark “Crosstrek”

Trek Bicycle Corporation

Subaru

Shortly after Subaru launched its newest vehicle named the “Crosstrek,” Trek Bicycle filed suit for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition of its “Trek” and numerous “Trek-formative” trademarks. Trek and Subaru had been long-standing partners in a professional mountain bike team. As such, in addition to its assertions of trademark infringement and dilution, Trek also alleged that Subaru’s “Crosstrek” name breached the existing sponsorship agreement. Trek moved for a preliminary injunction. Faced with the possibility of rebranding its new vehicle, Subaru turned to Finnegan. Finnegan put together a team that could handle expedited discovery (which was virtually case-comprehensive and involved extensive ESI document discovery and many fact and Rule 30(b)(6) depositions), working with experts to conduct likelihood of confusion and dilution surveys, calculate harm and damages, and study linguistic usage of the word “trek,” as well as obtaining and managing documents produced from dozens of third-party subpoenas. Finnegan uncovered facts leading to a counterclaim for genericness, abandonment, and fraud, as well important facts undermining the alleged strength of the Trek brand. Prior to the preliminary injunction hearing date, the case was favourably settled with Subaru’s ownership, use, and registration of its “Crosstrek” trademark unfettered and unchanged.

Trek Bicycle Corporation v. Subaru, 1:12-cv-09542, N.D. Ill., Judge Ellis

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Consumer Products

Transportation and Logistics

Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Related Experiences

Federal Circuit, district court, and arbitration victories protect Cumberland Pharmaceuticals’ flagship product, Acetadote®

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals

Protecting the patents of a household name

LG Electronics

Viskase Corp. v. W.R. Grace

W.R. Grace

Koni B.V. v. Tenneco Inc.

Tenneco Inc.

Superior Graphite Co. v. TIMCAL S.A., Ltd.

TIMCAL S.A., Ltd.

Alfa Laval, Alfdex AB v. Hengst, Paccar, Inc.

Alfa Laval; Alfdex AB

Fisher Paykel v. LG Electronics

LG Electronics

Experience_Ninth_Circuit_affirms_dismissal_of_over-reaching_trademark_and_copyright_infringement_complaint_against_Subaru

Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of over-reaching trademark and copyright infringement complaint against Subaru

Subaru of America, Inc.

SRAM, LLC v. Race Face Performance Products

Race Face Performance Products

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP