直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Davis

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Arthur Davis

Served as counsel in a landmark pro bono case in which client Arthur Davis was granted a new trial after 33 years of incarceration. Mr. Davis was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to life without the possibility of parole in 1986. Eight years of investigation, motion practice, and DNA testing culminated in a motion for new trial filed in 2017, which was granted in November 2018. The Commonwealth has not yet indicated whether it will seek to retry Mr. Davis.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Arthur Davis, 85-720, Mass. Sup. Ct., Judge Kirpalani

Tags

pro bono

Related Experiences

Lengthy deliberations result in winning decision for DeWalch Technologies

DeWalch Technologies, Inc.

Juniper Networks, Inc. v. S. Vasanthkumar

Juniper Networks, Inc.

Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox Canada

Foster-Miller, Inc.

Finnegan trade secret case resolved with favorable summary judgment for client RichWave

RichWave Technology Corporation

Early summary judgment leads to settlement in case involving semiconductor technology

Axcelis Technologies

Protecting the trademark of a household name

LG Electronics

Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al. v. Amerlux, LLC, et al.

Koninklijke Philips N.V.

Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al. v. Roy-CSL Lighting, Inc.

Koninklijke Philips N.V.

Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al. v. Schreder Lighting LLC, et al.

Koninklijke Philips N.V.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP