Associate
Brandon Andersen focuses on patent prosecution and litigation, including inter partes reviews before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), in the areas of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, automotive technology, clean energy, and medical devices. He has technical experience as a nuclear plant engineer, designing systems and training operators for the U.S. Navy's nuclear submarine program. Brandon also has research experience in both biomedical devices and combustion engineering.
Brandon has experience prosecuting patents before the USPTO for inventions in the automotive, pharmaceutical, and renewable energy technology areas. In addition, he has provided validity and freedom-to-operate opinions in the areas of pharmaceuticals and medical devices.
Brandon has litigation experience in pre-trial work such as claim analysis, prior art searches, discovery, and motions practice. He excels at providing thorough legal research and clear analysis. In inter partes review proceedings before the PTAB, Brandon has written pleadings and worked with experts to prepare supporting declarations. He also has experience preparing both appeal and amicus curie briefs for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
After earning his master's degree in chemical engineering, Brandon spent three years supporting the U.S. Navy's nuclear submarine program as a nuclear plant engineer. He provided both classroom and hands-on training to naval officers and enlisted personnel, and he led a watchteam dedicated to the operation and maintenance of a nuclear power plant. As a trainer, Brandon developed an ability to clearly teach engineering principals to those without a scientific background. Brandon also worked as a system design engineer, responsible for designing and preparing the operations manual for a key safety system connected to the nuclear reactor.
Brandon has also conducted research in the biomedical and combustion engineering fields. For his master's thesis, he created a multi-processor, three-dimensional predictive computer model of blood thrombosis and embolization in cardiovascular devices based on chemical kinetics, transport phenomena, and computational fluid dynamics. Brandon also performed research in a combustion lab, performing experiments and building computational models to improve the predictability of flame spread in forest fires.
Pro bono work is an important part of Brandon's practice, through which he enjoys working on behalf of military veterans and asylum applicants. He has written winning arguments before both the Board of Immigration Appeals and the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Brandon has also appeared on behalf of asylum applicants in immigration court.
In Re Certain Polycrystalline Diamond Compacts and Articles Containing Same
Secured a decisive victory for client US Synthetic Corp. (USS) at the ITC. After a full hearing, the ALJ found that respondents infringed multiple claims of USS’s patent and that the claims were valid and supported by a domestic industry, but an initial Commission ruling under § 101 temporarily prevented a finding of violation of Section 337. The Federal Circuit reversed the § 101 ruling, and on remand the ITC found a violation and issued a limited exclusion order barring infringing polycrystalline diamond products from entry into the United States, securing final relief for USS.
337-TA-1236, ITC, Judge Elliot
US Synthetic Corporation (USS) v. International Trade Commission (ITC)
Secured a significant victory for client US Synthetic Corporation (USS) with a precedential decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) overturning an unfavorable 35 U.S.C. § 101 eligibility ruling from the International Trade Commission (ITC).
23-1217, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Dyk, Stoll
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. et al. v. Syngenta Seeds, LLC
Representing plaintiff Pioneer in a district court patent infringement litigation involving methods for producing doubled haploid maize plants.
1:22-cv-01280, D. Del.
Bayer Cropscience LP et al. v. Corteva Agriscience LLC et al.
N22C-07-168, Delaware Superior Court, Complex Commercial Litigation Division
Corteva Agriscience LLC v. Monsanto Company et al.
Representing plaintiff Corteva Agriscience in a district court patent infringement litigation involving transgenic plants and plant cells that produce enzymes conferring herbicide resistance.
1:22-cv-01046, D. Del., Judge Williams
Maglula, Ltd. v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
1:19-cv-01570, E.D. Va., Judge O'Grady
Articles
When Export Controls Meet IP: Lessons from Westinghouse v. KEPCO When Export Controls Meet IP: Lessons from Westinghouse v. KEPCO
January/February 2026
IP LitigatorArticles
Switching Sides: When Do Courts Disqualify Expert Witnesses? Switching Sides: When Do Courts Disqualify Expert Witnesses?
July/August 2025
IP LitigatorWebinar
What’s Next After a PTAB Discretionary Denial? Potential Challenges, Avenues to Judicial Review, and Strategic Considerations What’s Next After a PTAB Discretionary Denial? Potential Challenges, Avenues to Judicial Review, and Strategic Considerations
July 17, 2025
Webinar
Articles
Navigating Through the Gate: Admitting Expert Testimony in IP Litigation Navigating Through the Gate: Admitting Expert Testimony in IP Litigation
January/February 2025
IP LitigatorArticles
Shall We Strive for More Clarity and Remove Shall from Our Contracts? Shall We Strive for More Clarity and Remove Shall from Our Contracts?
December 29, 2024
LES InsightsArticles
Patent Marking Requirements Patent Marking Requirements
November/December 2023
IP LitigatorAward/Ranking
61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll
May 7, 2026
Press Release
Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting
April 28, 2026
Press Release
Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting
April 24, 2026
Press Release
U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Limited Exclusion Order for US Synthetic in Investigation Against Foreign Diamond Makers U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Limited Exclusion Order for US Synthetic in Investigation Against Foreign Diamond Makers
December 23, 2025
Award/Ranking
56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll
April 24, 2025
DC BarMedia Mention
Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs: US Synthetic Corp. Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs: US Synthetic Corp.
February 21, 2025
The AmLaw Litigation DailyDue to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.