直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Podcast

Mark Sommers Discusses the Southern District of New York's Decision to Grant Broad Injunctive Relief to Tory Burch and Future Implications to Fashion Counterfeiters

October 28, 2011

By Mark Sommers

The fashion industry continues to face a surge in sophisticated criminal counterfeiting operations–many are aggressive in their online efforts to market and sell luxury brand knockoffs. A recent court decision in the Southern District of New York granted broad injunctive relief to luxury brand retailer Tory Burch, who had filed suit after discovering more than 200 different websites selling counterfeit versions of its signature products. In this podcast, Finnegan partner Mark Sommers discusses the recent court decision, and the precedent it upholds in imposing measures against the next-generation methods and techniques counterfeiters are using to dodge liability.

Downloadable Files

  • Podcast: Mark Sommers Discusses the Southern District of New York's Decision to Grant Broad Injunctive Relief to Tory Burch and the Future Implications to Fashion Counterfeiters

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Counterfeiting/Gray Market Goods

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Related Professionals

Mark Sommers
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4064
Email

Related Insights

Seminar

Future IP UK

October 21, 2026

London

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Deadline Evolution: Director Extends Deadline for Requesting Director Review of Institution Grants to 30 Days

June 30, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

New Informative Decision Applies the USPTO’s U.S. Manufacturing and Small Business Use of AIA Proceedings Memo

June 18, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Reinforces Injury-in-Fact Requirement in Appeals from Post-Grant Proceedings

June 10, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP