直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Podcast

Mark Sommers on Matal v. Tam

August 07, 2017

By Mark Sommers

On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Matal v. Tam, which considered the federal trademark act’s (known as the "Lanham Act") prohibition against registering trademarks comprised of disparaging names. In that case, "The Slants," an Asian-American band, were refused a trademark based on the potentially-offensive nature of the name. The Supreme Court ruled that prohibiting the registration of offensive trademarks is unconstitutional and violates the First Amendment. In this podcast, Finnegan partner Mark Sommers discusses the Supreme Court’s decision.

Tags

disparagement, Matal v. Tam, Lanham Act

Downloadable Files

  • Sommers_MatalvTam_08.07.17

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Mark Sommers
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4064
Email

Related Insights

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Reverses TTAB: Strength of Mark Depends on Commercial Association

January 13, 2026

Webinar

Distinctive by Design: Filing and Protecting Non-Traditional Marks (NTMS)

December 9, 2025

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates TTAB Decision Finding Likelihood of Confusion and Remands for Further Analysis of Third-Party Uses of Similar Marks in Use on Similar Services

October 27, 2025

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2025

October 20-21, 2025

San Francisco

Articles

Thumbnail-Certification-Mark-Pitfalls-Managing-Problems-of-Genericness-Descriptiveness-and-Consumer-Protection

Certification Mark Pitfalls: Managing Problems of Genericness, Descriptiveness, and Consumer Perception

September/October 2025

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

TTAB Reverses Refusal of C SHARPE Mark: Slash in Mark Does Not Prevent Specimen from Being a “Substantially Exact Representation” of Drawing

August 6, 2025

Articles

Keeping Promises: Enforcement Strategies for Certification Marks in the United States

May/June 2025

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Ivy Group Blocks Trademark Registration of IV LEAGUE NURSE CONCIERGE, INC. for IV Therapy Services, Claiming Dilution of the Famous IVY LEAGUE Marks

June 30, 2025

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

E.D. Va. Confirms Cancellation of General Cigar’s COHIBA Marks under Inter-American Convention

June 11, 2025

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP