8 results
Articles
The Supreme Court’s Tam Decision: Federally Registered Offensive Trademarks The Supreme Court’s Tam Decision: Federally Registered Offensive Trademarks
September 6, 2017
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
Supreme Court Rules “Disparagement Clause” of the Lanham Act Unconstitutional Supreme Court Rules “Disparagement Clause” of the Lanham Act Unconstitutional
June 23, 2017
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
USPTO Concedes Federal Circuit’s In re Tam Ruling Also Invalidates Lanham Act’s Scandalous and Immoral Ban USPTO Concedes Federal Circuit’s In re Tam Ruling Also Invalidates Lanham Act’s Scandalous and Immoral Ban
February 4, 2016
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
District Court Affirms Cancellation Of “Redskins” Trademarks District Court Affirms Cancellation Of “Redskins” Trademarks
July 15, 2015
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
Federal Circuit Affirms TTAB Decision Refusing Registration of THE SLANTS Mark on Disparagement Grounds Federal Circuit Affirms TTAB Decision Refusing Registration of THE SLANTS Mark on Disparagement Grounds
April 21, 2015
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
PORNO JESUS Mark Refused as Disparaging to Christian-Americans PORNO JESUS Mark Refused as Disparaging to Christian-Americans
March 30, 2015
3 results
Commentary
Q&A: Trademark Expert Mark Sommers on Washington Football Team's New Name Q&A: Trademark Expert Mark Sommers on Washington Football Team's New Name
January 20, 2022
Westlaw TodayMedia Mention
Attorneys Predict Outcome of Washington Redskins' Trademark Spat Attorneys Predict Outcome of Washington Redskins' Trademark Spat
June 21, 2017
Westlaw Journal Intellectual PropertyMedia Mention
“Simple and Correct” or “Tremendous Damage to Minorities”? Opinion Split on Matal v. Tam Decision “Simple and Correct” or “Tremendous Damage to Minorities”? Opinion Split on Matal v. Tam Decision
June 20, 2017
World Trademark ReviewDue to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.