April 24, 2018
By Erika Harmon Arner; Cory C. Bell; Rachel L. Emsley; Michael J. Flibbert; Joshua L. Goldberg; Maureen D. Queler; Jason E. Stach; Trenton A. Ward
On April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court released its highly anticipated decision in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC (No. 16-712). In Oil States, the Court determined that inter partes reviews (IPR) do not violate Article III and the Seventh Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Court determined that “[i]nter partes review falls squarely within the public-rights doctrine,” and as public rights, Congress has “significant latitude to assign adjudication . . . to entities other than Article III courts.”
Stay tuned to this page for further updates and resources on the Supreme Court’s decision and its potential impact.
Finnegan Insights:
Podcast: Trenton Ward and Rachel Emsley on Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC and SAS Institute v. Iancu
Following the Supreme Court's decisions, Finnegan attorneys share their insights on these two very important cases.
Court Documents:
Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group LLC, Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), America Invents Act (AIA)
Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.
Federal Circuit IP Blog
June 26, 2026
Articles
May 29, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
When “and” and “e.g.” Matter: Federal Circuit Revives VLSI vs. Intel Case
May 14, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.