直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

IP Update

Case Watch: Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC

April 24, 2018

By Erika Harmon Arner; Cory C. Bell; Rachel L. Emsley; Michael J. Flibbert; Joshua L. Goldberg; Maureen D. Queler; Jason E. Stach; Trenton A. Ward

On April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court released its highly anticipated decision in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC (No. 16-712). In Oil States, the Court determined that inter partes reviews (IPR) do not violate Article III and the Seventh Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Court determined that “[i]nter partes review falls squarely within the public-rights doctrine,” and as public rights, Congress has “significant latitude to assign adjudication . . . to entities other than Article III courts.”

Stay tuned to this page for further updates and resources on the Supreme Court’s decision and its potential impact. 

Infographic-Top-5-Takeaways-Oil-States-and-SAS

Finnegan Insights:

  • Podcast: Trenton Ward and Rachel Emsley on Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC and SAS Institute v. Iancu
    Following the Supreme Court's decisions, Finnegan attorneys share their insights on these two very important cases. 

  • IP Update: A Practical Guide to the Supreme Court's Oil States Decision
    Finnegan attorneys answer key questions as a result of the Oil States decision.
  • Webinar: Oil States and SAS Decisions: Game Changers or Business as Usual?
    On April 25, 2018, several of Finnegan’s leading PTAB practitioners will present a webinar to discuss the decision and how it will affect IPRs, the PTAB, and your business. You can register here for the webinar.
  • Podcast: Oil States Energy Services v. Greene’s Energy Group
    This podcast serves as a short primer on Oil States and its potential ramifications. 
  • Article: A Handy Guide to Oil States, the Case that Has Captivated the Patent Community
    This article provides a detailed look at the issues raised in Oil States.
  • Webinar: Oil States and SAS: Takeaways from the Live Arguments Before the Supreme Court
    Listen to this on-demand webinar for a detailed look at the oral arguments in Oil States, predictions on how the Court might rule based on those arguments, and practical pointers for what to do now while the case is pending.

Court Documents:

  • Supreme Court Decision - April 24, 2018
  • Oil States’ Opening Brief
  • Greene’s Response
  • Federal Respondent’s Response
  • Oil States’ Reply Brief 
  • Audio and Transcript: Oral Argument - November 27, 2017

Tags

Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group LLC, Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), America Invents Act (AIA)

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Boston, MA

Reston, VA

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Erika Harmon Arner
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 571 203 2754
Email
Cory C. Bell
Partner
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1641
Email
Michael J. Flibbert
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4493
Email
Joshua L. Goldberg
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 202 408 6092
Email
Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email

Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Federal Circuit IP Blog

When “and” and “e.g.” Matter: Federal Circuit Revives VLSI vs. Intel Case

May 14, 2026

Ad Law Buzz Blog

How to Survive a Section 230 Defense: Recent Cases Provide Guidance

May 1, 2026

Articles

TOPCon v. Back-Contact Solar Cells: The Technology Race Fueled by Patent Strategy, Enforcement and Licensing

April 27, 2026

Articles

The UPC - Only Three Years Old and Already Leading

The UPC - Only Three Years Old and Already Leading

March 18, 2026

Webinar

Recent Pharmaceutical, Chemical, and Biotech Case Law on Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents

March 12, 2026

Webinar

At the PTAB Blog

Director Reinforces Post-Revvo Limits on Inconsistent Claim Construction Positions Between District Court and the PTAB

February 24, 2026

Webinar

Protect Your Innovations: Recent Patent Case Law in the Life Sciences

February 11, 2026

Webinar

At the PTAB Blog

Pruning the Branches: Director Limits Parallel PTAB Petitions in PacifiCorp v. Birchtech

February 6, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Says PTAB’s Delay Is Not a Reviewable “Shenanigan” Under APA

February 2, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP