Articles
EPR Academy, Part 2 of 6: The EPR Process – From Request to Reexamination Certificate
December 5, 2025
IP Updates
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Affirms § 102(b) Invalidity; Source Code Commands Are Not Hearsay
May 14, 2026
Never miss an Insight.
Sign upArticles
2024: A Year of Trade Secret Cases in Review 2024: A Year of Trade Secret Cases in Review
January 13, 2025
LES InsightsArticles
Going Off-Track: NASCAR, DraftKings and NBA Face Down Secrets Theft Going Off-Track: NASCAR, DraftKings and NBA Face Down Secrets Theft
November 4, 2024
World Intellectual Property ReviewArticles
Trade Secret Claim Still Viable Despite Disclosure in Patent Application Trade Secret Claim Still Viable Despite Disclosure in Patent Application
May 3, 2024
Westlaw TodayArticles
The DTSA's 'Interstate Commerce Requirement': Has It Had an Impact? The DTSA's 'Interstate Commerce Requirement': Has It Had an Impact?
April 24, 2024
Westlaw TodayArticles
A Look at Ex Parte Seizures 8 Years Post-DTSA A Look at Ex Parte Seizures 8 Years Post-DTSA
April 17, 2024
Law360Articles
Ex Parte Seizure Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act: Insights on the New Remedy Ex Parte Seizure Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act: Insights on the New Remedy
April 8, 2020
Westlaw Journal Intellectual PropertyArticles
Trade Secrets: Protection and Remedies Trade Secrets: Protection and Remedies
January 2020
Bloomberg LawArticles
Three Years Later: How the Defend Trade Secrets Act Complicated the Law Instead of Making It More Uniform Three Years Later: How the Defend Trade Secrets Act Complicated the Law Instead of Making It More Uniform
July/August 2019
IP LitigatorArticles
Granting a License on One Invention Does Not Necessarily Exhaust Rights in a Separate and Distinct Invention Useful in Practicing the Licensed Invention Granting a License on One Invention Does Not Necessarily Exhaust Rights in a Separate and Distinct Invention Useful in Practicing the Licensed Invention
March 17, 2015
LES InsightsArticles
Court Denies Patent Owner’s Request for Additional Damages Because Patent Owner’s Inaction Contributed to the Alleged Deficiency in the Jury’s Award Court Denies Patent Owner’s Request for Additional Damages Because Patent Owner’s Inaction Contributed to the Alleged Deficiency in the Jury’s Award
December 16, 2014
LES InsightsArticles
Defendant Is Ordered to Pay Patent Owner’s Attorney Fees for Aggressively Pursuing Patent-Invalidity Defenses That "Bordered on Frivolous" to Increase Plaintiff's Costs Defendant Is Ordered to Pay Patent Owner’s Attorney Fees for Aggressively Pursuing Patent-Invalidity Defenses That "Bordered on Frivolous" to Increase Plaintiff's Costs
September 16, 2014
LES InsightsArticles
Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Willful Infringer but Tailors Injunction to Protect Public's Interest in Having Access to Effective Medical Treatment Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Willful Infringer but Tailors Injunction to Protect Public's Interest in Having Access to Effective Medical Treatment
June 24, 2014
LES InsightsDue to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.