直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

IP Update

White House Releases National AI Legislative Framework

March 23, 2026

By Lynn Parker Dupree; Jillian M. Baggett

On March 20, 2026, the White House released a comprehensive national legislative framework outlining policy recommendations to address rising concerns related to artificial intelligence (“AI”). The framework includes seven primary points:

1. Protecting children and empowering parents, including acknowledging the applicability of existing child privacy protections to AI systems, and providing parents with tools to control children’s privacy settings. 

2. Safeguarding and strengthening American communities, including mitigating rising electrical costs associated with AI infrastructure, combating AI-enabled scams, and enhancing national security capabilities. 

3. Respecting intellectual property rights and supporting creators, primarily by allowing the judiciary to resolve whether the doctrine of fair use protects AI providers’ ability to train AI models with copyrighted materials.

4. Preventing censorship and protecting free speech, through preventing government influence in content moderation based on ideological grounds and providing redress against the federal government where an agency has engaged in efforts to censor expression on AI platforms.

5. Enabling innovation and ensuring American dominance, including establishing regulatory sandboxes and providing federal datasets to industry and academia, while discouraging any new rulemaking bodies from regulating AI.

6. Educating Americans and developing an AI-ready workforce, including by ensuring that existing education programs incorporate AI training, studying trends in task-level workforce realignment, and bolstering the ability of land-grant institutions to provide technical support, launch demonstration projects, and youth programs.

7. Establishing a federal policy framework, preempting cumbersome state AI laws, asserting that Congress should preempt extensive state AI regulation because AI development is an “inherently interstate phenomenon,” the growth of which would be hindered by “patchwork” state laws, while preserving the right of states to legislate in the areas of child protection, consumer protection, and fraud prevention.

Takeaways

The administration’s new legislative framework signals a clear focus on American technological competitiveness and a recognition of the American public’s rising concerns about the impact of AI in the domains of consumer privacy, the job market, and intellectual property. The Framework also underscores the goal of achieving a unified national approach to AI regulation, which leaves open questions regarding the impact the Framework may have on state-level regulation.

Tags

AI + Patent, AI + Privacy, AI + Trademark, AI + Copyright, AI + Trade Secrets

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Lynn Parker Dupree
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4462
Email
Jillian M. Baggett
Associate
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6441
Email

Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

2026 AIPLA Annual Meeting

October 29-31, 2026

Washington, DC

Seminar

Future IP UK

October 21, 2026

London

Conference

2026 FCBA Global Series Fall Session

October 14-16, 2026

Dublin

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Articles

Blaker v. NetScout Systems: A Narrow Reading of the Pen Register and Trap and Trace Provisions of the California Invasion of Privacy Act in California State Court

July 29, 2026

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Conference

2026 China Pharmaceutical Innovation Conference

July 22-24, 2026

Shanghai

Articles

Highlights and Implications of the UK Corporate Plan for the UKIPO

July 17, 2026

Articles

This Article Was Written Entirely by AI — Welcome to Synthetic Patent Litigation

July/August 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP