直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Webinar

Appeals, Reexaminations, Reissues, Oh My: Strategic Considerations

August 20, 2015

Webinar

View Webinar

Acquiring meaningful issued claims from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is a challenge. Often, USPTO examiners request—in exchange for an allowance—claim amendments that can narrow and diminish the potential value of the claims. If an agreement cannot be reached, the only available option may be filing an appeal. At that point, applicants are confronted with several decisions, such as whether to file a pre-appeal brief to the Examining Corps or proceed straight to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

Our speakers will address pre-grant considerations and strategies for navigating applications through PTAB appeals, as well as post-grant considerations and strategies for selecting an appropriate proceeding and navigating your claims through the selected proceeding.

Please join us for a practical discussion on topics that include:

  • Tips for setting up an appeal
  • Considerations on whether to pursue a pre-appeal brief
  • Strategies for appealing to the PTAB
  • Alternatives to appealing, such as continuation and divisional applications
  • Post-grant options for updating claim scope
  • Strategies for navigating your claims through post-grant proceedings

This webinar is the third and final segment of Finnegan’s summer 2015 series, “Innovate Your U.S. Patent Prosecution: Today’s Techniques and Considerations.”

Moderator:
Ningling Wang


Speakers:
Adriana L. Burgy
Aaron J. Capron

Date:
Thursday, August 20, 2015

Time:

7:30 - 8:30 a.m. India
10:00 - 11:00 a.m. China/Taiwan
11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Japan/Korea

 

Tags

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

Downloadable Files

  • Webinar: Appeals, Reexaminations, Reissues, Oh My: Strategic Considerations

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Ex Parte Reexamination (EPR)

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Patent Reissues

Appeals to the PTAB

Related Professionals

Adriana L. Burgy
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4345
Email
Aaron J. Capron
Partner
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6680
Email
Ningling Wang
Partner
Shanghai
+86 21 6194 2005
Email

Related Insights

Articles

California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data

June 4, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Claim Disclaimer Derails Instituted IPR in Freightcar America

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Webinar

Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement

May 18, 2026

Webinar

Seminar

IP Strategy at the Crossroads: Technology, Enforcement, and Contracts

May 15, 2026

Taipei

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms § 102(b) Invalidity; Source Code Commands Are Not Hearsay

May 14, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

When “and” and “e.g.” Matter: Federal Circuit Revives VLSI vs. Intel Case

May 14, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP