直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

USPTO Diversion Pilot Program for Minor Issues of Misconduct Formalized

July 21, 2023

Authored and Edited by Adriana L. Burgy; Stacy Lewis†

In addition to state bar disciplinary rules, the United States Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO) bar has its own set of disciplinary rules, enforced by the Office of Enrollment and Discipline. These rules are set out in 37 C.F.R. Part 11.

On July 14, 2023, the USPTO issued a Final Rule announcing, “Changes to the Representation of Others Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.”[1] These changes formalize the USPTO’s Diversion Pilot Program; this program was initially set up “for patent and trademark practitioners whose physical or mental health issues or law practice management issues resulted in minor misconduct.” In formalizing this program, USPTO disciplinary practice is now aligned with most state attorney disciplinary practices.

Other highlights of the final rule are:

  • Foreign attorneys or agents granted reciprocal recognition to practice before the USPTO in trademark matters are required to provide and update their contact and licensure status information or have their recognition withdrawn so the public will have access to up-to date information;
  • Deferral to a state’s attorney licensing authority regarding alternative business structures between a practitioner and a non-practitioner to reduce the potential for conflicts between the USPTO and the attorney licensing authority;
  • Removal of a fee required when changing one’s status from a patent agent to a patent attorney;
  • Removal of term “nonimmigrant alien” from provision regarding limited recognition for individuals who are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents, but who nevertheless have been granted status and the authority to work in the United States by the U.S. Government in order to practice before the USPTO in patent matters; and
  • Minor adjustments to other provisions related to the representation of others before the USPTO.

The Diversion Pilot Program began in September 2017 as an alternative to formal discipline. “The Diversion Pilot Program is available to practitioners whose physical or mental health issues (e.g., issues tied to substance/alcohol abuse) or law practice management issues (e.g., inadequate client communication or docket management) resulted in minor misconduct and little, if any, harm to a client.”[2] A practitioner’s participation in the Diversion Pilot Program is intended to provide the practitioner with an opportunity to rectify the underlying cause of the practitioner’s misconduct, thus reducing the chance that the misconduct will recur or escalate. Through the program, practitioners may avoid formal discipline by successfully completing diversion agreements with the OED Director. The criteria for participation are set forth at 37 C.F.R. §11.30. More information on the Diversion Pilot Program can be found on the USPTO website, https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/OED_Diversion_Pilot_Program.pdf .

Before formalizing the Diversion Pilot Program, the USPTO published proposed rules on September 8, 2022, and then received comments from four organizations and one individual. The comments are summarized in the notice of the final rule, https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2023-14606.pdf

Endnotes

[1] 88 Fed. Reg. 45,078 (July 14, 2023).

[2] https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/OED_Diversion_Pilot_Program.pdf

Tags

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Related Practices

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Counseling and Prosecution

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Contacts

Adriana L. Burgy
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4345
Email

†Stacy Lewis is a Law Clerk at Finnegan.

Copyright © 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Claim Disclaimer Derails Instituted IPR in Freightcar America

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Conference

19th Annual Forum on Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation in Europe

May 19-20, 2026

Amsterdam

Webinar

Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement

May 18, 2026

Webinar

Articles

COPPA’s Amended Rule Is Now in Full Effect: What Operators Need to Know

May 15, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP