December 04, 2015
Authored and Edited by Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.; Leslie A. McDonell
The “effective filing date” for a claimed invention in a patent or application for patent is the earlier of: (1) the actual filing date of the patent or the application containing a claim to the invention; or (2) the filing date of the earliest priority application (i.e., the earliest filed provisional, nonprovisional, international, or foreign application) to which a patent or patent application is entitled to a right of priority for the claimed invention. See 35 U.S.C. § 100(i). Effective filing date is evaluated on a claim-by-claim basis. In general, this means a claim is entitled to the filing date of the earliest filed application supporting that claim.
The effective filing date determines the universe of prior art available against a claim or application, and also determines whether an application will be examined under the pre-AIA first-to-invent system, or AIA’s first-inventor-to-file system. The following figure depicts the impact of the effective filing date on choice of law:
If the effective filing date of all claims that a patent or application contains (or contained at any time) is after March 15, 2013, then the prior art provisions, exceptions, and definitions of AIA apply to all claims. Conversely, if all claims that a patent or application contains have an effective filing date before March 16, 2013, only the pre-AIA prior art provisions apply. If, however, an application contains (or contained at any time) at least one claim having an effective filing date before March 16, 2013, and at least one claim having an effective filing date after March 15, 2013, all of the claims of that application are subject to the prior art provisions of AIA §§ 102 and 103 plus pre-AIA §§ 102(g). See 125 Stat. 293.
Copyright © 2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
At the PTAB Blog
IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in February 2024
April 16, 2024
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
April 12, 2024
Conference
Boston Intellectual Property Law Association 4th Annual Symposium
April 10-11, 2024
Boston
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.