直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

Effective Filing Date: What is that again?

December 04, 2015

Authored and Edited by Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.; Leslie A. McDonell

The “effective filing date” for a claimed invention in a patent or application for patent is the earlier of: (1) the actual filing date of the patent or the application containing a claim to the invention; or (2) the filing date of the earliest priority application (i.e., the earliest filed provisional, nonprovisional, international, or foreign application) to which a patent or patent application is entitled to a right of priority for the claimed invention. See 35 U.S.C. § 100(i). Effective filing date is evaluated on a claim-by-claim basis. In general, this means a claim is entitled to the filing date of the earliest filed application supporting that claim.

The effective filing date determines the universe of prior art available against a claim or application, and also determines whether an application will be examined under the pre-AIA first-to-invent system, or AIA’s first-inventor-to-file system. The following figure depicts the impact of the effective filing date on choice of law:

12.4.15 Post Image

If the effective filing date of all claims that a patent or application contains (or contained at any time) is after March 15, 2013, then the prior art provisions, exceptions, and definitions of AIA apply to all claims. Conversely, if all claims that a patent or application contains have an effective filing date before March 16, 2013, only the pre-AIA prior art provisions apply. If, however, an application contains (or contained at any time) at least one claim having an effective filing date before March 16, 2013, and at least one claim having an effective filing date after March 15, 2013, all of the claims of that application are subject to the prior art provisions of AIA §§ 102 and 103 plus pre-AIA §§ 102(g). See 125 Stat. 293.

Tags

patent application, Benefit of Priority, patentability, prior art

Contacts

Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2814
Email

Copyright © 2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

ChIPs Global Summit 2026

October 21-23, 2026

Los Angeles

Webinar

A Year of Change for Post-Grant Patent Challenges: Key PTAB and CRU Developments, and Strategic Implications

August 19, 2026

Webinar

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in June and July 2026

August 19, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Squires Issues Precedential Decision Clarifying Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rejections

August 17, 2026

Articles

Privacy Law Mid-Year Update: Key EU and UK Data Protection Decisions

August 13, 2026

European IP Blog

UPC Action Permissibly Lodged Prior to the Grant of a European Patent

12 August 2026

Seminar

IAM and WTR Live: Australasia IP Forum 2026

August 11, 2026

Melbourne

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in May 2026

July 31, 2026

Articles

Blaker v. NetScout Systems: A Narrow Reading of the Pen Register and Trap and Trace Provisions of the California Invasion of Privacy Act in California State Court

July 29, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP