直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB Obviousness Finding in DRAM Data Path Patent

October 5, 2026

Authored and Edited by Caleb D. Estes; Christopher B. Anderson; Erik R. Puknys

In Netlist Inc. v. Micron Technology Inc., No. 2024-1707 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 2, 2026), the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s finding of unpatentability for  U.S. Patent No. 10,949,339.

Samsung filed an IPR seeking to invalidate Netlist’s patent directed to selectively enabling data paths through a data buffer between a memory controller and DRAM device. In its final written decision, the Board found that Netlist’s patent was obvious over prior art and the general knowledge of a skilled artisan.

On appeal, The Federal Circuit affirmed the Board’s findings. The Court rejected Netlist’s position that the primary reference did not teach selectively enabling data paths. Although the Board relied on a background reference not asserted in any ground of Samsung’s petition to fill a missing limitation, the Court held that any potential error was harmless because the Board alternatively found the limitation taught by the primary reference alone. The Court further rebuffed a series of challenges to the Board’s mapping of “data paths” onto the prior art, crediting Samsung’s expert testimony and inconsistencies within Netlist’s own claim mapping. Finally, the Court rejected Netlist’s APA allegations that the Board merely “summarized Samsung’s ‘contentions’ and [found] that Netlist ‘does not dispute’ them,” holding that Netlist failed to raise this argument with proper specificity.

Tags

prior art, Obviousness (35 USC § 103)

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electronic Devices and Components

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Palo Alto, CA

Reston, VA

Contacts

Caleb D. Estes
Associate
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6442
Email
Christopher B. Anderson
Associate
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2765
Email
Erik R. Puknys
Partner
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6644
Email

Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

2027 ABA-IPL Section Annual Meeting – IPLSPRING

April 14-15, 2027

Arlington

Conference

Patent Litigation Europe 2027

January 18-20, 2027

Amsterdam

Conference

IP Life Sciences Forum 2026

December 13-15, 2026

Coral Gables

Panel Discussion

2026 Advanced Patent Law Institute

December 3-4, 2026

Stanford

Conference

IPBC Asia 2026

November 17-19, 2026

Tokyo

Conference

NAPABA Convention 2026

November 12-14, 2026

Los Angeles

Conference

IAM Live: Trade Secret Strategy USA

November 10, 2026

San Jose

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

Life Sciences Patent Network North America Fall 2026

November 2-3, 2026

San Francisco

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP